Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Practices and problems in the management of ris...
View graph of relations

Practices and problems in the management of risk redisributions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Practices and problems in the management of risk redisributions. / Busby, J S; Sedmak, M.

In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2011, p. 259-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Busby, JS & Sedmak, M 2011, 'Practices and problems in the management of risk redisributions', Journal of Risk Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 259-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.528561

APA

Vancouver

Author

Busby, J S ; Sedmak, M. / Practices and problems in the management of risk redisributions. In: Journal of Risk Research. 2011 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 259-279.

Bibtex

@article{cb3224c8e727455da285d26f4484f25b,
title = "Practices and problems in the management of risk redisributions",
abstract = "The redistribution of risk across social groups is an important aspect of risk analysis. This article argues for a more general concept of risk redistribution across any significant categorisation, however, not just social groups. This includes the redistribution of risk across different kinds of harm, different kinds of failure mode and so on. These redistributions are connected by the way in which they all somehow threaten coping capacities that are adapted to specific past distributions: for example redistributions across failure modes threaten technological and organisational risk controls, whereas redistributions across social groups can threaten notions of fairness and social order. The purpose of the study described here was to investigate this general concept of risk redistribution as a managerial problem. It involved interviews with regulatory and consultancy staff, predominantly in offshore, maritime and railroad operations. These indicated that redistribution was a ubiquitous outcome of activity – and not one confined to discontinuous changes in technology or organisation. Yet, the management of this redistribution was not strongly institutionalised. It was mostly not embodied as an important concept in regulations, codes and procedures and it was not a product of risk assessment processes. But there was a considerable sensitivity to how both technological change and the practice of risk management itself produced redistributions, and extensive efforts were often made to deal with them in the informal domain.",
author = "Busby, {J S} and M Sedmak",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2010.528561",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "259--279",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practices and problems in the management of risk redisributions

AU - Busby, J S

AU - Sedmak, M

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The redistribution of risk across social groups is an important aspect of risk analysis. This article argues for a more general concept of risk redistribution across any significant categorisation, however, not just social groups. This includes the redistribution of risk across different kinds of harm, different kinds of failure mode and so on. These redistributions are connected by the way in which they all somehow threaten coping capacities that are adapted to specific past distributions: for example redistributions across failure modes threaten technological and organisational risk controls, whereas redistributions across social groups can threaten notions of fairness and social order. The purpose of the study described here was to investigate this general concept of risk redistribution as a managerial problem. It involved interviews with regulatory and consultancy staff, predominantly in offshore, maritime and railroad operations. These indicated that redistribution was a ubiquitous outcome of activity – and not one confined to discontinuous changes in technology or organisation. Yet, the management of this redistribution was not strongly institutionalised. It was mostly not embodied as an important concept in regulations, codes and procedures and it was not a product of risk assessment processes. But there was a considerable sensitivity to how both technological change and the practice of risk management itself produced redistributions, and extensive efforts were often made to deal with them in the informal domain.

AB - The redistribution of risk across social groups is an important aspect of risk analysis. This article argues for a more general concept of risk redistribution across any significant categorisation, however, not just social groups. This includes the redistribution of risk across different kinds of harm, different kinds of failure mode and so on. These redistributions are connected by the way in which they all somehow threaten coping capacities that are adapted to specific past distributions: for example redistributions across failure modes threaten technological and organisational risk controls, whereas redistributions across social groups can threaten notions of fairness and social order. The purpose of the study described here was to investigate this general concept of risk redistribution as a managerial problem. It involved interviews with regulatory and consultancy staff, predominantly in offshore, maritime and railroad operations. These indicated that redistribution was a ubiquitous outcome of activity – and not one confined to discontinuous changes in technology or organisation. Yet, the management of this redistribution was not strongly institutionalised. It was mostly not embodied as an important concept in regulations, codes and procedures and it was not a product of risk assessment processes. But there was a considerable sensitivity to how both technological change and the practice of risk management itself produced redistributions, and extensive efforts were often made to deal with them in the informal domain.

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2010.528561

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2010.528561

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 259

EP - 279

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 2

ER -