Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Policy Studies on 16/08/2016 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01442872.2016.1219033
Accepted author manuscript, 256 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Pragmatic complexity
T2 - a new foundation for moving beyond ‘evidence-based policy making?
AU - Ansell, Christopher
AU - Geyer, Robert Ralph
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Policy Studies on 16/08/2016 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01442872.2016.1219033
PY - 2017/4
Y1 - 2017/4
N2 - Despite a range of criticism, the realm of policy still remains dominated by the rational, positivist and quantitative approaches of New Public Management, ‘evidence-based’ approaches and target/accountancy oriented ‘scientific’ management. Two notable attempts to develop an alternative to this dominant framework, however, have come from the older tradition of American pragmatism and the newer approach of complexity. In this article we introduce some of the core concepts of pragmatist philosophy and complexity relating to policy making. We then explore some of the key premises for bringing these two fields together and subsequently apply this ‘pragmatic complexity’ approach and a Stacey Diagram to drug policy. We argue that a marriage of pragmatism and complexity can provide a positive alternative conception of the relationship between scientific knowledge and decision-making and offers a way to integrate a scientific approach with democratic deliberation and values.
AB - Despite a range of criticism, the realm of policy still remains dominated by the rational, positivist and quantitative approaches of New Public Management, ‘evidence-based’ approaches and target/accountancy oriented ‘scientific’ management. Two notable attempts to develop an alternative to this dominant framework, however, have come from the older tradition of American pragmatism and the newer approach of complexity. In this article we introduce some of the core concepts of pragmatist philosophy and complexity relating to policy making. We then explore some of the key premises for bringing these two fields together and subsequently apply this ‘pragmatic complexity’ approach and a Stacey Diagram to drug policy. We argue that a marriage of pragmatism and complexity can provide a positive alternative conception of the relationship between scientific knowledge and decision-making and offers a way to integrate a scientific approach with democratic deliberation and values.
KW - Complexity theory
KW - Pragmatism
KW - drug policy
KW - policy making
U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2016.1219033
DO - 10.1080/01442872.2016.1219033
M3 - Journal article
VL - 38
SP - 149
EP - 167
JO - Policy Studies
JF - Policy Studies
SN - 0144-2872
IS - 2
ER -