Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Predicting farm-level animal populations using ...

Electronic data

  • 1-s2.0-S0167587716304810-main

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Preventive Veterinary Medicine . Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 145, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005

    Accepted author manuscript, 2.35 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

  • Modeling domestic animal populations_03032016_cpj

    557 KB, Word document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Predicting farm-level animal populations using environmental and socioeconomic variables

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Predicting farm-level animal populations using environmental and socioeconomic variables. / van Andel, Mary; Jewell, Christopher Parry; McKenzie, Joanna et al.
In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 145, 15.09.2017, p. 121-132.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

van Andel, M, Jewell, CP, McKenzie, J, Hollings, T, Robinson, A, Burgman, M, Bingham, P & Carpenter, T 2017, 'Predicting farm-level animal populations using environmental and socioeconomic variables', Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 145, pp. 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005

APA

van Andel, M., Jewell, C. P., McKenzie, J., Hollings, T., Robinson, A., Burgman, M., Bingham, P., & Carpenter, T. (2017). Predicting farm-level animal populations using environmental and socioeconomic variables. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 145, 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005

Vancouver

van Andel M, Jewell CP, McKenzie J, Hollings T, Robinson A, Burgman M et al. Predicting farm-level animal populations using environmental and socioeconomic variables. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2017 Sept 15;145:121-132. Epub 2017 Jul 16. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005

Author

van Andel, Mary ; Jewell, Christopher Parry ; McKenzie, Joanna et al. / Predicting farm-level animal populations using environmental and socioeconomic variables. In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 145. pp. 121-132.

Bibtex

@article{02163ecf04d747bea27b34a05bc6855b,
title = "Predicting farm-level animal populations using environmental and socioeconomic variables",
abstract = "Accurate information on the geographic distribution of domestic animal populations helps biosecurity authorities to efficiently prepare for and rapidly eradicate exotic diseases, such as Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). Developing and maintaining sufficiently high-quality data resources is expensive and time consuming. Statistical modelling of population density and distribution has only begun to be applied to farm animal populations, although it is commonly used in wildlife ecology. We developed zero-inflated Poisson regression models in a Bayesian framework using environmental and socioeconomic variables to predict the counts of livestock units (LSUs) and of cattle on spatially referenced farm polygons in a commercially available New Zealand farm database, Agribase. Farm-level counts of cattle and of LSUs varied considerably by region, because of the heterogeneous farming landscape in New Zealand. The amount of high quality pasture per farm was significantly associated with the presence of both cattle and LSUs. Internal model validation (predictive performance) showed that the models were able to predict the count of the animal population on groups of farms that were located in randomly selected 3 km zones with a high level of accuracy. Predicting cattle or LSU counts on individual farms was less accurate. Predicted counts were statistically significantly more variable for farms that were contract grazing dry stock, such as replacement dairy heifers and dairy cattle not currently producing milk, compared with other farm types. This analysis presents a way to predict numbers of LSUs and cattle for farms using environmental and socio-economic data. The technique has the potential to be extrapolated to predicting other pastoral based livestock species.",
keywords = "Biosecurity, Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation, Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression, species distribution modelling, spatial epidemiology",
author = "{van Andel}, Mary and Jewell, {Christopher Parry} and Joanna McKenzie and Tracey Hollings and Andrew Robinson and Mark Burgman and Paul Bingham and Tim Carpenter",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Preventive Veterinary Medicine . Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 145, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
pages = "121--132",
journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",
issn = "0167-5877",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting farm-level animal populations using environmental and socioeconomic variables

AU - van Andel, Mary

AU - Jewell, Christopher Parry

AU - McKenzie, Joanna

AU - Hollings, Tracey

AU - Robinson, Andrew

AU - Burgman, Mark

AU - Bingham, Paul

AU - Carpenter, Tim

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Preventive Veterinary Medicine . Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 145, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005

PY - 2017/9/15

Y1 - 2017/9/15

N2 - Accurate information on the geographic distribution of domestic animal populations helps biosecurity authorities to efficiently prepare for and rapidly eradicate exotic diseases, such as Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). Developing and maintaining sufficiently high-quality data resources is expensive and time consuming. Statistical modelling of population density and distribution has only begun to be applied to farm animal populations, although it is commonly used in wildlife ecology. We developed zero-inflated Poisson regression models in a Bayesian framework using environmental and socioeconomic variables to predict the counts of livestock units (LSUs) and of cattle on spatially referenced farm polygons in a commercially available New Zealand farm database, Agribase. Farm-level counts of cattle and of LSUs varied considerably by region, because of the heterogeneous farming landscape in New Zealand. The amount of high quality pasture per farm was significantly associated with the presence of both cattle and LSUs. Internal model validation (predictive performance) showed that the models were able to predict the count of the animal population on groups of farms that were located in randomly selected 3 km zones with a high level of accuracy. Predicting cattle or LSU counts on individual farms was less accurate. Predicted counts were statistically significantly more variable for farms that were contract grazing dry stock, such as replacement dairy heifers and dairy cattle not currently producing milk, compared with other farm types. This analysis presents a way to predict numbers of LSUs and cattle for farms using environmental and socio-economic data. The technique has the potential to be extrapolated to predicting other pastoral based livestock species.

AB - Accurate information on the geographic distribution of domestic animal populations helps biosecurity authorities to efficiently prepare for and rapidly eradicate exotic diseases, such as Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). Developing and maintaining sufficiently high-quality data resources is expensive and time consuming. Statistical modelling of population density and distribution has only begun to be applied to farm animal populations, although it is commonly used in wildlife ecology. We developed zero-inflated Poisson regression models in a Bayesian framework using environmental and socioeconomic variables to predict the counts of livestock units (LSUs) and of cattle on spatially referenced farm polygons in a commercially available New Zealand farm database, Agribase. Farm-level counts of cattle and of LSUs varied considerably by region, because of the heterogeneous farming landscape in New Zealand. The amount of high quality pasture per farm was significantly associated with the presence of both cattle and LSUs. Internal model validation (predictive performance) showed that the models were able to predict the count of the animal population on groups of farms that were located in randomly selected 3 km zones with a high level of accuracy. Predicting cattle or LSU counts on individual farms was less accurate. Predicted counts were statistically significantly more variable for farms that were contract grazing dry stock, such as replacement dairy heifers and dairy cattle not currently producing milk, compared with other farm types. This analysis presents a way to predict numbers of LSUs and cattle for farms using environmental and socio-economic data. The technique has the potential to be extrapolated to predicting other pastoral based livestock species.

KW - Biosecurity

KW - Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation

KW - Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression

KW - species distribution modelling

KW - spatial epidemiology

U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 145

SP - 121

EP - 132

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

SN - 0167-5877

ER -