Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aor...
View graph of relations

Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aortic reconstruction: comparison of a revised Goldman cardiac risk index and radioisotope ejection fraction.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aortic reconstruction: comparison of a revised Goldman cardiac risk index and radioisotope ejection fraction. / Karkos, Christos D.; Thomson, George J.; Hughes, Robert et al.
In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 35, No. 5, 05.2002, p. 943-949.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Karkos, CD, Thomson, GJ, Hughes, R, Hollis, S, Hill, JC & Mukhopadhyay, US 2002, 'Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aortic reconstruction: comparison of a revised Goldman cardiac risk index and radioisotope ejection fraction.', Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 943-949. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.121982

APA

Karkos, C. D., Thomson, G. J., Hughes, R., Hollis, S., Hill, J. C., & Mukhopadhyay, U. S. (2002). Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aortic reconstruction: comparison of a revised Goldman cardiac risk index and radioisotope ejection fraction. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 35(5), 943-949. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.121982

Vancouver

Karkos CD, Thomson GJ, Hughes R, Hollis S, Hill JC, Mukhopadhyay US. Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aortic reconstruction: comparison of a revised Goldman cardiac risk index and radioisotope ejection fraction. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2002 May;35(5):943-949. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121982

Author

Karkos, Christos D. ; Thomson, George J. ; Hughes, Robert et al. / Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aortic reconstruction: comparison of a revised Goldman cardiac risk index and radioisotope ejection fraction. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2002 ; Vol. 35, No. 5. pp. 943-949.

Bibtex

@article{7fd48c461c494858868778551d187cf4,
title = "Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aortic reconstruction: comparison of a revised Goldman cardiac risk index and radioisotope ejection fraction.",
abstract = "A revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index has been suggested to identify patients at higher risk for cardiac complications in patients who undergo major noncardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to test the usefulness of this model in an independent series of patients who underwent abdominal aortic surgery and to compare the index with the multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan in the prediction of cardiac complications. Methods: We studied 77 patients who underwent MUGA scan before elective abdominal aortic reconstruction. The revised index was calculated for each patient after recording the following five risk factors: history of ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, insulin-dependent diabetes, and creatinine level more than 2 mg/dL. Technetium-99m MUGA scan provided information about the resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the presence of regional wall motion abnormalities. Results: Fourteen patients (18%) had cardiac complications develop. The index proved to be a satisfactory predictor of postoperative cardiac events (P = .008), and an abnormal LVEF failed to do so (P = .1). The presence of wall abnormalities, with or without an abnormal LVEF, predicted cardiac complications (P = .004 and P = .006). Patients with a higher index score showed a tendency to have a lower LVEF (Spearman rank correlation, r = −0.43; P < .001). Wall abnormalities, with or without an abnormal LVEF, were more frequent in patients with higher scores (P = .03 and P = .009). Combining the index with the LVEF or the wall abnormalities or both could further stratify the cardiac risk (P = .004, P = .0003 and P = .0006, with χ2 test for trend). Conclusion: For those patients who undergo elective abdominal aortic surgery, the revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index is a simple method of evaluating cardiac risk with minimum resource implications. MUGA scan can offer additional stratification in patients judged with the index to be at high risk.",
author = "Karkos, {Christos D.} and Thomson, {George J.} and Robert Hughes and Sally Hollis and Hill, {Jonathan C.} and Mukhopadhyay, {Umasankar S.}",
year = "2002",
month = may,
doi = "10.1067/mva.2002.121982",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "943--949",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aortic reconstruction: comparison of a revised Goldman cardiac risk index and radioisotope ejection fraction.

AU - Karkos, Christos D.

AU - Thomson, George J.

AU - Hughes, Robert

AU - Hollis, Sally

AU - Hill, Jonathan C.

AU - Mukhopadhyay, Umasankar S.

PY - 2002/5

Y1 - 2002/5

N2 - A revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index has been suggested to identify patients at higher risk for cardiac complications in patients who undergo major noncardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to test the usefulness of this model in an independent series of patients who underwent abdominal aortic surgery and to compare the index with the multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan in the prediction of cardiac complications. Methods: We studied 77 patients who underwent MUGA scan before elective abdominal aortic reconstruction. The revised index was calculated for each patient after recording the following five risk factors: history of ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, insulin-dependent diabetes, and creatinine level more than 2 mg/dL. Technetium-99m MUGA scan provided information about the resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the presence of regional wall motion abnormalities. Results: Fourteen patients (18%) had cardiac complications develop. The index proved to be a satisfactory predictor of postoperative cardiac events (P = .008), and an abnormal LVEF failed to do so (P = .1). The presence of wall abnormalities, with or without an abnormal LVEF, predicted cardiac complications (P = .004 and P = .006). Patients with a higher index score showed a tendency to have a lower LVEF (Spearman rank correlation, r = −0.43; P < .001). Wall abnormalities, with or without an abnormal LVEF, were more frequent in patients with higher scores (P = .03 and P = .009). Combining the index with the LVEF or the wall abnormalities or both could further stratify the cardiac risk (P = .004, P = .0003 and P = .0006, with χ2 test for trend). Conclusion: For those patients who undergo elective abdominal aortic surgery, the revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index is a simple method of evaluating cardiac risk with minimum resource implications. MUGA scan can offer additional stratification in patients judged with the index to be at high risk.

AB - A revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index has been suggested to identify patients at higher risk for cardiac complications in patients who undergo major noncardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to test the usefulness of this model in an independent series of patients who underwent abdominal aortic surgery and to compare the index with the multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan in the prediction of cardiac complications. Methods: We studied 77 patients who underwent MUGA scan before elective abdominal aortic reconstruction. The revised index was calculated for each patient after recording the following five risk factors: history of ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, insulin-dependent diabetes, and creatinine level more than 2 mg/dL. Technetium-99m MUGA scan provided information about the resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the presence of regional wall motion abnormalities. Results: Fourteen patients (18%) had cardiac complications develop. The index proved to be a satisfactory predictor of postoperative cardiac events (P = .008), and an abnormal LVEF failed to do so (P = .1). The presence of wall abnormalities, with or without an abnormal LVEF, predicted cardiac complications (P = .004 and P = .006). Patients with a higher index score showed a tendency to have a lower LVEF (Spearman rank correlation, r = −0.43; P < .001). Wall abnormalities, with or without an abnormal LVEF, were more frequent in patients with higher scores (P = .03 and P = .009). Combining the index with the LVEF or the wall abnormalities or both could further stratify the cardiac risk (P = .004, P = .0003 and P = .0006, with χ2 test for trend). Conclusion: For those patients who undergo elective abdominal aortic surgery, the revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index is a simple method of evaluating cardiac risk with minimum resource implications. MUGA scan can offer additional stratification in patients judged with the index to be at high risk.

U2 - 10.1067/mva.2002.121982

DO - 10.1067/mva.2002.121982

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 943

EP - 949

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 5

ER -