Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Predisposition to Out-of-Body Experience (OBE) ...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • 05_RHI_Threat_Paper_with_Figs_JJB_dgw_HD

    Rights statement: This article may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.

    Accepted author manuscript, 454 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Predisposition to Out-of-Body Experience (OBE) is associated with aberrations in multisensory integration: psychophysiological support from a “rubber-hand illusion” study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>06/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Issue number6
Volume43
Number of pages19
Pages (from-to)1125-1143
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date6/03/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

It has been argued that disorders in body-ownership and aberrant experiences in self-consciousness are due to biases in multisensory integration. Here we examine whether such biases are also associated with spontaneous Out-of-Body Experiences (OBEs) in a non-clinical population. One-hundred and eighty participants took part in a rubber-hand illusion (RHI) experiment with synchronous and asynchronous visual and tactile stimulation. A realistic threat was delivered to the rubber-hand after a fixed period of stimulation. Self-report exit questionnaires measured the subjective strength of the illusion and psychophysiological measures (skin conductance responses / finger temperature) provided an objective index of fear / anxiety towards the threat. Control participants reported a stronger RHI, and revealed larger threat-related skin conductance responses during synchronous compared with asynchronous brushing. For participants predisposed to OBEs, the magnitude of the skin conductance was not influenced by brushing synchrony - fear responses were just as strong in the asynchronous condition as they were in the synchronous condition. There were also no reliable effects of finger-temperature for either group. Collectively, these findings are taken as support for the presence of particular biases in multisensory integration (perhaps via predictive coding mechanisms) in which imprecise top-down tuning occurs resulting in aberrant experiences in self-consciousness even in non-clinical hallucinators.

Bibliographic note

This article may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.