Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Preventing children's injuries : exploring meth...
View graph of relations

Preventing children's injuries : exploring methodological issues in the systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Preventing children's injuries : exploring methodological issues in the systematic review of qualitative evidence. / Roen, Katrina; Arai, Lisa; Roberts, Helen et al.
In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 63, No. 4, 08.2006, p. 1060-1071.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Roen K, Arai L, Roberts H, Popay J. Preventing children's injuries : exploring methodological issues in the systematic review of qualitative evidence. Social Science and Medicine. 2006 Aug;63(4):1060-1071.

Author

Roen, Katrina ; Arai, Lisa ; Roberts, Helen et al. / Preventing children's injuries : exploring methodological issues in the systematic review of qualitative evidence. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 63, No. 4. pp. 1060-1071.

Bibtex

@article{729f45a2dd4641f79ead06ffb520ac2d,
title = "Preventing children's injuries : exploring methodological issues in the systematic review of qualitative evidence.",
abstract = "Unintentional injury is a leading cause of mortality and disability among young and old. While evidence about the effectiveness of interventions in reducing injuries is accumulating, reviews of this evidence frequently fail to include details of implementation processes. Our research, of which the work reported here formed a part, had two main objectives: (1) to identify evidence about the implementation of interventions aimed at reducing unintentional injuries amongst children and young people; and (2) to explore methods for systematically reviewing evidence on implementation. Existing systematic reviews of the effectiveness of interventions aiming to reduce unintentional injuries in children and young people formed the starting point for the work reported here. In summary, many of the published papers we identified contained little information on implementation processes and, even when these were discussed, the extent to which authors{\textquoteright} claims were based on research evidence was unclear. On the basis of the studies we reviewed implementation data were insufficiently strong to provide a sound evidence base for practitioners and policymakers. Notwithstanding this, we identified valuable data about the context in which such initiatives are implemented and the type of factors that might impinge on implementation. This work has implications in three areas: (1) researchers with an interest in evidence-based public health could be encouraged to consider implementation issues in the design of intervention studies; (2) funding bodies could be encouraged to prioritise intervention studies using mixed methods that will enable researchers to consider effectiveness and implementation; (3) journal editors could work towards increasing the quality of reporting on implementation issues through the development of guidelines.",
keywords = "Injury prevention, Unintentional injury, Implementation, Interventions, Qualitative, Systematic review",
author = "Katrina Roen and Lisa Arai and Helen Roberts and Jennie Popay",
year = "2006",
month = aug,
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "1060--1071",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preventing children's injuries : exploring methodological issues in the systematic review of qualitative evidence.

AU - Roen, Katrina

AU - Arai, Lisa

AU - Roberts, Helen

AU - Popay, Jennie

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Unintentional injury is a leading cause of mortality and disability among young and old. While evidence about the effectiveness of interventions in reducing injuries is accumulating, reviews of this evidence frequently fail to include details of implementation processes. Our research, of which the work reported here formed a part, had two main objectives: (1) to identify evidence about the implementation of interventions aimed at reducing unintentional injuries amongst children and young people; and (2) to explore methods for systematically reviewing evidence on implementation. Existing systematic reviews of the effectiveness of interventions aiming to reduce unintentional injuries in children and young people formed the starting point for the work reported here. In summary, many of the published papers we identified contained little information on implementation processes and, even when these were discussed, the extent to which authors’ claims were based on research evidence was unclear. On the basis of the studies we reviewed implementation data were insufficiently strong to provide a sound evidence base for practitioners and policymakers. Notwithstanding this, we identified valuable data about the context in which such initiatives are implemented and the type of factors that might impinge on implementation. This work has implications in three areas: (1) researchers with an interest in evidence-based public health could be encouraged to consider implementation issues in the design of intervention studies; (2) funding bodies could be encouraged to prioritise intervention studies using mixed methods that will enable researchers to consider effectiveness and implementation; (3) journal editors could work towards increasing the quality of reporting on implementation issues through the development of guidelines.

AB - Unintentional injury is a leading cause of mortality and disability among young and old. While evidence about the effectiveness of interventions in reducing injuries is accumulating, reviews of this evidence frequently fail to include details of implementation processes. Our research, of which the work reported here formed a part, had two main objectives: (1) to identify evidence about the implementation of interventions aimed at reducing unintentional injuries amongst children and young people; and (2) to explore methods for systematically reviewing evidence on implementation. Existing systematic reviews of the effectiveness of interventions aiming to reduce unintentional injuries in children and young people formed the starting point for the work reported here. In summary, many of the published papers we identified contained little information on implementation processes and, even when these were discussed, the extent to which authors’ claims were based on research evidence was unclear. On the basis of the studies we reviewed implementation data were insufficiently strong to provide a sound evidence base for practitioners and policymakers. Notwithstanding this, we identified valuable data about the context in which such initiatives are implemented and the type of factors that might impinge on implementation. This work has implications in three areas: (1) researchers with an interest in evidence-based public health could be encouraged to consider implementation issues in the design of intervention studies; (2) funding bodies could be encouraged to prioritise intervention studies using mixed methods that will enable researchers to consider effectiveness and implementation; (3) journal editors could work towards increasing the quality of reporting on implementation issues through the development of guidelines.

KW - Injury prevention

KW - Unintentional injury

KW - Implementation

KW - Interventions

KW - Qualitative

KW - Systematic review

M3 - Journal article

VL - 63

SP - 1060

EP - 1071

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 4

ER -