Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Prevention of sexual violence and domestic abus...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Prevention of sexual violence and domestic abuse through a university bystander intervention programme: learning from a UK feasibility study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Prevention of sexual violence and domestic abuse through a university bystander intervention programme: learning from a UK feasibility study. / Barter, Christine; Bracewell, Kelly; Farrelly, Nicole et al.
In: Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 15.04.2024, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Barter C, Bracewell K, Farrelly N, Clelland AK, Chantler K. Prevention of sexual violence and domestic abuse through a university bystander intervention programme: learning from a UK feasibility study. Journal of Gender-Based Violence. 2024 Apr 15;1-18. Epub 2024 Apr 15. doi: 10.1332/23986808y2024d000000030

Author

Barter, Christine ; Bracewell, Kelly ; Farrelly, Nicole et al. / Prevention of sexual violence and domestic abuse through a university bystander intervention programme: learning from a UK feasibility study. In: Journal of Gender-Based Violence. 2024 ; pp. 1-18.

Bibtex

@article{d7587cb1776045dda0acd53ffa565445,
title = "Prevention of sexual violence and domestic abuse through a university bystander intervention programme: learning from a UK feasibility study",
abstract = "In response to evidence documenting the scale and impact of sexual violence (SV) and domestic abuse (DA) in universities, Universities UK (2016) recommend implementation of a UK based bystander programme, The Intervention Initiative (TII), as a key prevention strategy. However, a recent UK review (Gaffney et al, 2023) concluded that no studies have addressed implementation issues for university-based bystander programmes. Our study explored what is required for implementation of the TII in a UK university, rather than intervention effectiveness. The intervention was delivered to undergraduate students across three school cohorts: medicine, social work and sports coaching. The study draws on pre- and post-intervention surveys to explore SV and DA knowledge, attitudes, and bystander skills. Focus groups or individual interviews with students (n=11) and staff facilitators (n=10) explored experiences of implementation, delivery and participation. Students reported positive changes across several areas and some evidence of immediate impact on behaviours, suggesting potential for wider implementation across university contexts. Barriers included professionalisation of the application of the bystander intervention, resistance to an underpinning gendered evidence base and a lack of diversity and relatability in programme materials.",
keywords = "Law, Gender Studies",
author = "Christine Barter and Kelly Bracewell and Nicole Farrelly and Clelland, {Allyson K.} and Khatidja Chantler",
year = "2024",
month = apr,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1332/23986808y2024d000000030",
language = "English",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Journal of Gender-Based Violence",
issn = "2398-6808",
publisher = "Policy Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevention of sexual violence and domestic abuse through a university bystander intervention programme: learning from a UK feasibility study

AU - Barter, Christine

AU - Bracewell, Kelly

AU - Farrelly, Nicole

AU - Clelland, Allyson K.

AU - Chantler, Khatidja

PY - 2024/4/15

Y1 - 2024/4/15

N2 - In response to evidence documenting the scale and impact of sexual violence (SV) and domestic abuse (DA) in universities, Universities UK (2016) recommend implementation of a UK based bystander programme, The Intervention Initiative (TII), as a key prevention strategy. However, a recent UK review (Gaffney et al, 2023) concluded that no studies have addressed implementation issues for university-based bystander programmes. Our study explored what is required for implementation of the TII in a UK university, rather than intervention effectiveness. The intervention was delivered to undergraduate students across three school cohorts: medicine, social work and sports coaching. The study draws on pre- and post-intervention surveys to explore SV and DA knowledge, attitudes, and bystander skills. Focus groups or individual interviews with students (n=11) and staff facilitators (n=10) explored experiences of implementation, delivery and participation. Students reported positive changes across several areas and some evidence of immediate impact on behaviours, suggesting potential for wider implementation across university contexts. Barriers included professionalisation of the application of the bystander intervention, resistance to an underpinning gendered evidence base and a lack of diversity and relatability in programme materials.

AB - In response to evidence documenting the scale and impact of sexual violence (SV) and domestic abuse (DA) in universities, Universities UK (2016) recommend implementation of a UK based bystander programme, The Intervention Initiative (TII), as a key prevention strategy. However, a recent UK review (Gaffney et al, 2023) concluded that no studies have addressed implementation issues for university-based bystander programmes. Our study explored what is required for implementation of the TII in a UK university, rather than intervention effectiveness. The intervention was delivered to undergraduate students across three school cohorts: medicine, social work and sports coaching. The study draws on pre- and post-intervention surveys to explore SV and DA knowledge, attitudes, and bystander skills. Focus groups or individual interviews with students (n=11) and staff facilitators (n=10) explored experiences of implementation, delivery and participation. Students reported positive changes across several areas and some evidence of immediate impact on behaviours, suggesting potential for wider implementation across university contexts. Barriers included professionalisation of the application of the bystander intervention, resistance to an underpinning gendered evidence base and a lack of diversity and relatability in programme materials.

KW - Law

KW - Gender Studies

U2 - 10.1332/23986808y2024d000000030

DO - 10.1332/23986808y2024d000000030

M3 - Journal article

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Gender-Based Violence

JF - Journal of Gender-Based Violence

SN - 2398-6808

ER -