Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Price caps, oligopoly, and entry

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Price caps, oligopoly, and entry

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Price caps, oligopoly, and entry. / Reynolds, Stanley; Rietzke, David.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2015. (Economics Working Paper Series; Vol. 2015, No. 8).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Reynolds, S & Rietzke, D 2015 'Price caps, oligopoly, and entry' Economics Working Paper Series, no. 8, vol. 2015, Lancaster University, Department of Economics, Lancaster.

APA

Reynolds, S., & Rietzke, D. (2015). Price caps, oligopoly, and entry. (Economics Working Paper Series; Vol. 2015, No. 8). Lancaster University, Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Reynolds S, Rietzke D. Price caps, oligopoly, and entry. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics. 2015. (Economics Working Paper Series; 8).

Author

Reynolds, Stanley ; Rietzke, David. / Price caps, oligopoly, and entry. Lancaster : Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2015. (Economics Working Paper Series; 8).

Bibtex

@techreport{a8587af0b8d3464e99eea404ff05afaf,
title = "Price caps, oligopoly, and entry",
abstract = "We extend the analysis of price caps in oligopoly markets to allow for sunk entry costs and endogenous entry. In the case of deterministic demand and constant marginal cost, reducing a price cap yields increased total output, consumer welfare, and total welfare; results consistent with those for oligopoly markets with a fixed number of firms. With deterministic demand and increasing marginal cost these comparative static results may be fully reversed, and a welfare-improving cap may not exist. Recent results in the literature show that for a fixed number of firms, if demand is stochastic and marginal cost is constant then lowering a price cap may either increase or decrease output and welfare (locally); however, a welfare improving price cap does exist. In contrast to these recent results, we show that a welfare-improving cap may not exist if entry is endogenous. However, within this stochastic demand environment we show that certain restrictions on the curvature of demand are sufficient to ensure the existence of a welfare-improving cap when entry is endogenous.",
keywords = "Price caps, oligopoly, entry, stochastic demand",
author = "Stanley Reynolds and David Rietzke",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",
number = "8",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Price caps, oligopoly, and entry

AU - Reynolds, Stanley

AU - Rietzke, David

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We extend the analysis of price caps in oligopoly markets to allow for sunk entry costs and endogenous entry. In the case of deterministic demand and constant marginal cost, reducing a price cap yields increased total output, consumer welfare, and total welfare; results consistent with those for oligopoly markets with a fixed number of firms. With deterministic demand and increasing marginal cost these comparative static results may be fully reversed, and a welfare-improving cap may not exist. Recent results in the literature show that for a fixed number of firms, if demand is stochastic and marginal cost is constant then lowering a price cap may either increase or decrease output and welfare (locally); however, a welfare improving price cap does exist. In contrast to these recent results, we show that a welfare-improving cap may not exist if entry is endogenous. However, within this stochastic demand environment we show that certain restrictions on the curvature of demand are sufficient to ensure the existence of a welfare-improving cap when entry is endogenous.

AB - We extend the analysis of price caps in oligopoly markets to allow for sunk entry costs and endogenous entry. In the case of deterministic demand and constant marginal cost, reducing a price cap yields increased total output, consumer welfare, and total welfare; results consistent with those for oligopoly markets with a fixed number of firms. With deterministic demand and increasing marginal cost these comparative static results may be fully reversed, and a welfare-improving cap may not exist. Recent results in the literature show that for a fixed number of firms, if demand is stochastic and marginal cost is constant then lowering a price cap may either increase or decrease output and welfare (locally); however, a welfare improving price cap does exist. In contrast to these recent results, we show that a welfare-improving cap may not exist if entry is endogenous. However, within this stochastic demand environment we show that certain restrictions on the curvature of demand are sufficient to ensure the existence of a welfare-improving cap when entry is endogenous.

KW - Price caps

KW - oligopoly

KW - entry

KW - stochastic demand

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Paper Series

BT - Price caps, oligopoly, and entry

PB - Lancaster University, Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster

ER -