Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms. / Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H.; Kellermanns, Franz.
In: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.05.2009, p. 739-760.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Chrisman, JJ, Chua, JH & Kellermanns, F 2009, 'Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 739-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00324.x

APA

Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Kellermanns, F. (2009). Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 739-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00324.x

Vancouver

Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Kellermanns F. Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2009 May 1;33(3):739-760. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00324.x

Author

Chrisman, James J. ; Chua, Jess H. ; Kellermanns, Franz. / Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms. In: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2009 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 739-760.

Bibtex

@article{44803ac6253044a5b3af88e280bbd0a5,
title = "Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms",
abstract = "This article discusses how the performance of family firms and nonfamily firms might differ as a result of the different priorities flowing from family influence, even when the two types of firms possess comparable levels of resource stocks. Using hierarchical regression to analyze data from a national study of the Small Business Development Center program, we find that family influence has both a positive and a negative moderating effect on the relationships between different categories of resource stocks and performance. Specifically, family firms benefit more from resource stocks based on external relationships while nonfamily firms benefit more from resource stocks based on functional skills.",
author = "Chrisman, {James J.} and Chua, {Jess H.} and Franz Kellermanns",
year = "2009",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00324.x",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "739--760",
journal = "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice",
issn = "1042-2587",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms

AU - Chrisman, James J.

AU - Chua, Jess H.

AU - Kellermanns, Franz

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - This article discusses how the performance of family firms and nonfamily firms might differ as a result of the different priorities flowing from family influence, even when the two types of firms possess comparable levels of resource stocks. Using hierarchical regression to analyze data from a national study of the Small Business Development Center program, we find that family influence has both a positive and a negative moderating effect on the relationships between different categories of resource stocks and performance. Specifically, family firms benefit more from resource stocks based on external relationships while nonfamily firms benefit more from resource stocks based on functional skills.

AB - This article discusses how the performance of family firms and nonfamily firms might differ as a result of the different priorities flowing from family influence, even when the two types of firms possess comparable levels of resource stocks. Using hierarchical regression to analyze data from a national study of the Small Business Development Center program, we find that family influence has both a positive and a negative moderating effect on the relationships between different categories of resource stocks and performance. Specifically, family firms benefit more from resource stocks based on external relationships while nonfamily firms benefit more from resource stocks based on functional skills.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00324.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00324.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 739

EP - 760

JO - Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

JF - Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

SN - 1042-2587

IS - 3

ER -