Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Prioritising Responses Of Nurses To deteriorati...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Prioritising Responses Of Nurses To deteriorating patient Observations (PRONTO): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a facilitation intervention on recognition and response to clinical deterioration

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Prioritising Responses Of Nurses To deteriorating patient Observations (PRONTO): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a facilitation intervention on recognition and response to clinical deterioration. / Bucknall, Tracey; Considine, Julie; Harvey, Gill et al.
In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 31, No. 11, 19.10.2022, p. 818-830.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bucknall, T, Considine, J, Harvey, G, Graham, ID, Rycroft-Malone, J, Mitchell, I, Saultry, B, Watts, J, Mohebbi, M, Mudiyanselage, SB, Lotfaliany, M & Hutchinson, AM 2022, 'Prioritising Responses Of Nurses To deteriorating patient Observations (PRONTO): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a facilitation intervention on recognition and response to clinical deterioration', BMJ Quality and Safety, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 818-830. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013785

APA

Bucknall, T., Considine, J., Harvey, G., Graham, I. D., Rycroft-Malone, J., Mitchell, I., Saultry, B., Watts, J., Mohebbi, M., Mudiyanselage, S. B., Lotfaliany, M., & Hutchinson, A. M. (2022). Prioritising Responses Of Nurses To deteriorating patient Observations (PRONTO): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a facilitation intervention on recognition and response to clinical deterioration. BMJ Quality and Safety, 31(11), 818-830. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013785

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{7488b99e46c441bf9c474b3e3642e272,
title = "Prioritising Responses Of Nurses To deteriorating patient Observations (PRONTO): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a facilitation intervention on recognition and response to clinical deterioration",
abstract = "Background: Most hospitals use physiological signs to trigger an urgent clinical review. We investigated whether facilitation could improve nurses{\textquoteright} vital sign measurement, interpretation, treatment and escalation of care for deteriorating patients. Methods: In a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, we randomised 36 inpatient wards at four acute hospitals to receive standard clinical practice guideline (CPG) dissemination to ward staff (n=18) or facilitated implementation for 6 months following standard dissemination (n=18). Expert, hospital and ward facilitators tailored facilitation techniques to promote nurses{\textquoteright} CPG adherence. Patient records were audited pre-intervention, 6 and 12 months post-intervention on randomly selected days. Escalation of care as per hospital policy was the primary outcome at 6 and 12 months after implementation. Patients, nurses and assessors were blinded to group assignment. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results: From 10 383 audits, improved escalation as per hospital policy was evident in the intervention group at 6 months (OR 1.47, 95% CI (1.06 to 2.04)) with a complete set of vital sign measurements sustained at 12 months (OR 1.22, 95% CI (1.02 to 1.47)). There were no significant differences in escalation of care as per hospital policy between study groups at 6 or 12 months post-intervention. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, a significant change from T0 in mean length of stay between groups at 12 months favoured the intervention group (−2.18 days, 95% CI (−3.53 to –0.82)). Conclusion: Multi-level facilitation significantly improved escalation as per hospital policy at 6 months in the intervention group that was not sustained at 12 months. The intervention group had increased vital sign measurement by nurses, as well as shorter lengths of stay for patients at 12 months. Further research is required to understand the dose of facilitation required to impact clinical practice behaviours and patient outcomes. Trial registration number: ACTRN12616000544471p",
keywords = "1506, Decision making, Implementation science, Medical emergency team, Nurses, Original research, Randomised controlled trial",
author = "Tracey Bucknall and Julie Considine and Gill Harvey and Graham, {Ian D.} and Jo Rycroft-Malone and Imogen Mitchell and Bridey Saultry and Jennifer Watts and Mohammadreza Mohebbi and Mudiyanselage, {Shalika Bohingamu} and Mojtaba Lotfaliany and Hutchinson, {Alison M}",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013785",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "818--830",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prioritising Responses Of Nurses To deteriorating patient Observations (PRONTO)

T2 - a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a facilitation intervention on recognition and response to clinical deterioration

AU - Bucknall, Tracey

AU - Considine, Julie

AU - Harvey, Gill

AU - Graham, Ian D.

AU - Rycroft-Malone, Jo

AU - Mitchell, Imogen

AU - Saultry, Bridey

AU - Watts, Jennifer

AU - Mohebbi, Mohammadreza

AU - Mudiyanselage, Shalika Bohingamu

AU - Lotfaliany, Mojtaba

AU - Hutchinson, Alison M

PY - 2022/10/19

Y1 - 2022/10/19

N2 - Background: Most hospitals use physiological signs to trigger an urgent clinical review. We investigated whether facilitation could improve nurses’ vital sign measurement, interpretation, treatment and escalation of care for deteriorating patients. Methods: In a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, we randomised 36 inpatient wards at four acute hospitals to receive standard clinical practice guideline (CPG) dissemination to ward staff (n=18) or facilitated implementation for 6 months following standard dissemination (n=18). Expert, hospital and ward facilitators tailored facilitation techniques to promote nurses’ CPG adherence. Patient records were audited pre-intervention, 6 and 12 months post-intervention on randomly selected days. Escalation of care as per hospital policy was the primary outcome at 6 and 12 months after implementation. Patients, nurses and assessors were blinded to group assignment. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results: From 10 383 audits, improved escalation as per hospital policy was evident in the intervention group at 6 months (OR 1.47, 95% CI (1.06 to 2.04)) with a complete set of vital sign measurements sustained at 12 months (OR 1.22, 95% CI (1.02 to 1.47)). There were no significant differences in escalation of care as per hospital policy between study groups at 6 or 12 months post-intervention. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, a significant change from T0 in mean length of stay between groups at 12 months favoured the intervention group (−2.18 days, 95% CI (−3.53 to –0.82)). Conclusion: Multi-level facilitation significantly improved escalation as per hospital policy at 6 months in the intervention group that was not sustained at 12 months. The intervention group had increased vital sign measurement by nurses, as well as shorter lengths of stay for patients at 12 months. Further research is required to understand the dose of facilitation required to impact clinical practice behaviours and patient outcomes. Trial registration number: ACTRN12616000544471p

AB - Background: Most hospitals use physiological signs to trigger an urgent clinical review. We investigated whether facilitation could improve nurses’ vital sign measurement, interpretation, treatment and escalation of care for deteriorating patients. Methods: In a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, we randomised 36 inpatient wards at four acute hospitals to receive standard clinical practice guideline (CPG) dissemination to ward staff (n=18) or facilitated implementation for 6 months following standard dissemination (n=18). Expert, hospital and ward facilitators tailored facilitation techniques to promote nurses’ CPG adherence. Patient records were audited pre-intervention, 6 and 12 months post-intervention on randomly selected days. Escalation of care as per hospital policy was the primary outcome at 6 and 12 months after implementation. Patients, nurses and assessors were blinded to group assignment. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results: From 10 383 audits, improved escalation as per hospital policy was evident in the intervention group at 6 months (OR 1.47, 95% CI (1.06 to 2.04)) with a complete set of vital sign measurements sustained at 12 months (OR 1.22, 95% CI (1.02 to 1.47)). There were no significant differences in escalation of care as per hospital policy between study groups at 6 or 12 months post-intervention. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, a significant change from T0 in mean length of stay between groups at 12 months favoured the intervention group (−2.18 days, 95% CI (−3.53 to –0.82)). Conclusion: Multi-level facilitation significantly improved escalation as per hospital policy at 6 months in the intervention group that was not sustained at 12 months. The intervention group had increased vital sign measurement by nurses, as well as shorter lengths of stay for patients at 12 months. Further research is required to understand the dose of facilitation required to impact clinical practice behaviours and patient outcomes. Trial registration number: ACTRN12616000544471p

KW - 1506

KW - Decision making

KW - Implementation science

KW - Medical emergency team

KW - Nurses

KW - Original research

KW - Randomised controlled trial

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013785

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013785

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35450936

VL - 31

SP - 818

EP - 830

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 11

ER -