Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Problematising ‘Recovery’ in drug policy within...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Problematising ‘Recovery’ in drug policy within Great Britain: A comparative policy analysis between England, Wales and Scotland

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Problematising ‘Recovery’ in drug policy within Great Britain: A comparative policy analysis between England, Wales and Scotland. / Klein, Maike; Bath, University.
In: Journal of Drug Policy Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 1, 20200001, 01.12.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Klein M, Bath U. Problematising ‘Recovery’ in drug policy within Great Britain: A comparative policy analysis between England, Wales and Scotland. Journal of Drug Policy Analysis. 2020 Dec 1;13(1): 20200001. Epub 2020 Oct 2. doi: 10.1515/jdpa-2020-0001

Author

Bibtex

@article{c4e41544826a4e03a61d8a991c1f68a4,
title = "Problematising {\textquoteleft}Recovery{\textquoteright} in drug policy within Great Britain: A comparative policy analysis between England, Wales and Scotland",
abstract = "Drug strategies in Great Britain emphasize the notion of recovery, with the concept being central in England, Wales and Scotland. There are however tensions, with recovery being defined differently across jurisdictions. In this study we address this dilemma by critically interrogating how the term recovery is represented, how these presentations are shaped and what effects are subsequently had. We applied an adapted version of Bacchi's What's the Problem Represented to Be? (WPR) policy analysis approach to the 2017 UK Drug Strategy, the 2008–2018 Welsh Drug Strategy and the 2008 Scottish Drug Strategy notions of service user responsibility; (b) recovery as {\textquoteleft}a problem of product quality{\textquoteright}, shaped by the implicit notion of service provider responsibility and the disease model of addiction; (c) recovery as {\textquoteleft}a problem of service collaboration and teamwork{\textquoteright}, underpinned by the bio-psycho-social model of addiction. We conclude that the problematisations found in GB{\textquoteright}s current drug policies have the ability to shape the drug policy-making process which may limit mainstream knowledge of recovery, and thereby unintentionally contribute to a narrow understanding of how to effectively support the service user community in their recovery from problematic drug use.",
author = "Maike Klein and University Bath",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/jdpa-2020-0001",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Drug Policy Analysis",
issn = "1941-2851",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problematising ‘Recovery’ in drug policy within Great Britain

T2 - A comparative policy analysis between England, Wales and Scotland

AU - Klein, Maike

AU - Bath, University

PY - 2020/12/1

Y1 - 2020/12/1

N2 - Drug strategies in Great Britain emphasize the notion of recovery, with the concept being central in England, Wales and Scotland. There are however tensions, with recovery being defined differently across jurisdictions. In this study we address this dilemma by critically interrogating how the term recovery is represented, how these presentations are shaped and what effects are subsequently had. We applied an adapted version of Bacchi's What's the Problem Represented to Be? (WPR) policy analysis approach to the 2017 UK Drug Strategy, the 2008–2018 Welsh Drug Strategy and the 2008 Scottish Drug Strategy notions of service user responsibility; (b) recovery as ‘a problem of product quality’, shaped by the implicit notion of service provider responsibility and the disease model of addiction; (c) recovery as ‘a problem of service collaboration and teamwork’, underpinned by the bio-psycho-social model of addiction. We conclude that the problematisations found in GB’s current drug policies have the ability to shape the drug policy-making process which may limit mainstream knowledge of recovery, and thereby unintentionally contribute to a narrow understanding of how to effectively support the service user community in their recovery from problematic drug use.

AB - Drug strategies in Great Britain emphasize the notion of recovery, with the concept being central in England, Wales and Scotland. There are however tensions, with recovery being defined differently across jurisdictions. In this study we address this dilemma by critically interrogating how the term recovery is represented, how these presentations are shaped and what effects are subsequently had. We applied an adapted version of Bacchi's What's the Problem Represented to Be? (WPR) policy analysis approach to the 2017 UK Drug Strategy, the 2008–2018 Welsh Drug Strategy and the 2008 Scottish Drug Strategy notions of service user responsibility; (b) recovery as ‘a problem of product quality’, shaped by the implicit notion of service provider responsibility and the disease model of addiction; (c) recovery as ‘a problem of service collaboration and teamwork’, underpinned by the bio-psycho-social model of addiction. We conclude that the problematisations found in GB’s current drug policies have the ability to shape the drug policy-making process which may limit mainstream knowledge of recovery, and thereby unintentionally contribute to a narrow understanding of how to effectively support the service user community in their recovery from problematic drug use.

U2 - 10.1515/jdpa-2020-0001

DO - 10.1515/jdpa-2020-0001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Drug Policy Analysis

JF - Journal of Drug Policy Analysis

SN - 1941-2851

IS - 1

M1 - 20200001

ER -