Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Procyclical government spending

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Procyclical government spending: a public choice analysis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Procyclical government spending: a public choice analysis. / Abbott, Andrew James; Jones, Philip.
In: Public Choice, Vol. 154, No. 3-4, 01.03.2013, p. 243-258.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Abbott AJ, Jones P. Procyclical government spending: a public choice analysis. Public Choice. 2013 Mar 1;154(3-4):243-258. Epub 2011 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s11127-011-9816-9

Author

Abbott, Andrew James ; Jones, Philip. / Procyclical government spending : a public choice analysis. In: Public Choice. 2013 ; Vol. 154, No. 3-4. pp. 243-258.

Bibtex

@article{682a73eea023433ba477196b647183ad,
title = "Procyclical government spending: a public choice analysis",
abstract = "Procyclical government spending occurs when government expenditures increase at a faster rate than income in an economic upturn but fall at a faster rate in a recession. Voracity effects occur when competition for increased spending proves more effective as national income increases. Public choice theory can be applied to describe the distribution of fiscal power across different tiers of government to shed insight into competition for intergovernmental transfers. Politicians have electoral incentives to press for intergovernmental transfers but they also have electoral incentives to signal their ability to manage the economy. With this mix of incentives, the prediction is that intergovernmental transfers will be procyclical and that sub-central government spending will be more procyclical than central government spending. Public choice analysis of pressure for increased public spending predicts a specific pattern of cyclical government spending. This pattern can be observed when analyzing government expenditures in 20 OECD countries",
keywords = "Business Cycles, Fiscal Policy, Voracity Effects, Volatility",
author = "Abbott, {Andrew James} and Philip Jones",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11127-011-9816-9",
language = "English",
volume = "154",
pages = "243--258",
journal = "Public Choice",
issn = "0048-5829",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3-4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procyclical government spending

T2 - a public choice analysis

AU - Abbott, Andrew James

AU - Jones, Philip

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Procyclical government spending occurs when government expenditures increase at a faster rate than income in an economic upturn but fall at a faster rate in a recession. Voracity effects occur when competition for increased spending proves more effective as national income increases. Public choice theory can be applied to describe the distribution of fiscal power across different tiers of government to shed insight into competition for intergovernmental transfers. Politicians have electoral incentives to press for intergovernmental transfers but they also have electoral incentives to signal their ability to manage the economy. With this mix of incentives, the prediction is that intergovernmental transfers will be procyclical and that sub-central government spending will be more procyclical than central government spending. Public choice analysis of pressure for increased public spending predicts a specific pattern of cyclical government spending. This pattern can be observed when analyzing government expenditures in 20 OECD countries

AB - Procyclical government spending occurs when government expenditures increase at a faster rate than income in an economic upturn but fall at a faster rate in a recession. Voracity effects occur when competition for increased spending proves more effective as national income increases. Public choice theory can be applied to describe the distribution of fiscal power across different tiers of government to shed insight into competition for intergovernmental transfers. Politicians have electoral incentives to press for intergovernmental transfers but they also have electoral incentives to signal their ability to manage the economy. With this mix of incentives, the prediction is that intergovernmental transfers will be procyclical and that sub-central government spending will be more procyclical than central government spending. Public choice analysis of pressure for increased public spending predicts a specific pattern of cyclical government spending. This pattern can be observed when analyzing government expenditures in 20 OECD countries

KW - Business Cycles

KW - Fiscal Policy

KW - Voracity Effects

KW - Volatility

U2 - 10.1007/s11127-011-9816-9

DO - 10.1007/s11127-011-9816-9

M3 - Journal article

VL - 154

SP - 243

EP - 258

JO - Public Choice

JF - Public Choice

SN - 0048-5829

IS - 3-4

ER -