Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Progressive hedging-based meta-heuristics for s...
View graph of relations

Progressive hedging-based meta-heuristics for stochastic network design

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Progressive hedging-based meta-heuristics for stochastic network design. / Crainic, Teodor G; Fu, Xiaorui; Gendreau, Michel et al.
In: Networks, Vol. 58, No. 2, 09.2011, p. 114-124.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Crainic, TG, Fu, X, Gendreau, M, Rei, W & Wallace, SW 2011, 'Progressive hedging-based meta-heuristics for stochastic network design', Networks, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.20456

APA

Crainic, T. G., Fu, X., Gendreau, M., Rei, W., & Wallace, S. W. (2011). Progressive hedging-based meta-heuristics for stochastic network design. Networks, 58(2), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.20456

Vancouver

Crainic TG, Fu X, Gendreau M, Rei W, Wallace SW. Progressive hedging-based meta-heuristics for stochastic network design. Networks. 2011 Sept;58(2):114-124. doi: 10.1002/net.20456

Author

Crainic, Teodor G ; Fu, Xiaorui ; Gendreau, Michel et al. / Progressive hedging-based meta-heuristics for stochastic network design. In: Networks. 2011 ; Vol. 58, No. 2. pp. 114-124.

Bibtex

@article{a49db97e337b42efadc74e9d3fe83777,
title = "Progressive hedging-based meta-heuristics for stochastic network design",
abstract = "We consider the stochastic fixed-charge capacitated multicommodity network design (S-CMND) problem with uncertain demand. We propose a two-stage stochastic programming formulation, where design decisions make up the first stage, while recourse decisions are made in the second stage to distribute the commodities according to observed demands. The overall objective is to optimize the cost of the first-stage design decisions plus the total expected distribution cost incurred in the second stage. To solve this formulation, we propose a metaheuristic framework inspired by the progressive hedging algorithm of Rockafellar and Wets. Following this strategy, scenario decomposition is used to separate the stochastic problem following the possible outcomes, scenarios, of the random event. Each scenario subproblem then becomes a deterministic CMND problem to be solved, which may be addressed by efficient specialized methods. We also propose and compare different strategies to gradually guide scenario subproblems to agree on the status of design arcs and aim for a good global design. These strategies are embedded into a parallel solution method, which is numerically shown to be computationally efficient and to yield high-quality solutions under various problem characteristics and demand correlations",
keywords = "stochastic network design, metaheuristics , progressive hedging , lagrangean relaxation",
author = "Crainic, {Teodor G} and Xiaorui Fu and Michel Gendreau and Walter Rei and Wallace, {Stein W}",
year = "2011",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1002/net.20456",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "114--124",
journal = "Networks",
issn = "0028-3045",
publisher = "Blackwell-Wiley",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Progressive hedging-based meta-heuristics for stochastic network design

AU - Crainic, Teodor G

AU - Fu, Xiaorui

AU - Gendreau, Michel

AU - Rei, Walter

AU - Wallace, Stein W

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - We consider the stochastic fixed-charge capacitated multicommodity network design (S-CMND) problem with uncertain demand. We propose a two-stage stochastic programming formulation, where design decisions make up the first stage, while recourse decisions are made in the second stage to distribute the commodities according to observed demands. The overall objective is to optimize the cost of the first-stage design decisions plus the total expected distribution cost incurred in the second stage. To solve this formulation, we propose a metaheuristic framework inspired by the progressive hedging algorithm of Rockafellar and Wets. Following this strategy, scenario decomposition is used to separate the stochastic problem following the possible outcomes, scenarios, of the random event. Each scenario subproblem then becomes a deterministic CMND problem to be solved, which may be addressed by efficient specialized methods. We also propose and compare different strategies to gradually guide scenario subproblems to agree on the status of design arcs and aim for a good global design. These strategies are embedded into a parallel solution method, which is numerically shown to be computationally efficient and to yield high-quality solutions under various problem characteristics and demand correlations

AB - We consider the stochastic fixed-charge capacitated multicommodity network design (S-CMND) problem with uncertain demand. We propose a two-stage stochastic programming formulation, where design decisions make up the first stage, while recourse decisions are made in the second stage to distribute the commodities according to observed demands. The overall objective is to optimize the cost of the first-stage design decisions plus the total expected distribution cost incurred in the second stage. To solve this formulation, we propose a metaheuristic framework inspired by the progressive hedging algorithm of Rockafellar and Wets. Following this strategy, scenario decomposition is used to separate the stochastic problem following the possible outcomes, scenarios, of the random event. Each scenario subproblem then becomes a deterministic CMND problem to be solved, which may be addressed by efficient specialized methods. We also propose and compare different strategies to gradually guide scenario subproblems to agree on the status of design arcs and aim for a good global design. These strategies are embedded into a parallel solution method, which is numerically shown to be computationally efficient and to yield high-quality solutions under various problem characteristics and demand correlations

KW - stochastic network design

KW - metaheuristics

KW - progressive hedging

KW - lagrangean relaxation

U2 - 10.1002/net.20456

DO - 10.1002/net.20456

M3 - Journal article

VL - 58

SP - 114

EP - 124

JO - Networks

JF - Networks

SN - 0028-3045

IS - 2

ER -