Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Proper efficiency and tradeoffs in multiple cri...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Proper efficiency and tradeoffs in multiple criteria and stochastic optimization

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Proper efficiency and tradeoffs in multiple criteria and stochastic optimization. / Engau, Alexander.
In: Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2017, p. 119-134.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Engau A. Proper efficiency and tradeoffs in multiple criteria and stochastic optimization. Mathematics of Operations Research. 2017;42(1):119-134. Epub 2016 Oct 6. doi: 10.1287/moor.2016.0796

Author

Engau, Alexander. / Proper efficiency and tradeoffs in multiple criteria and stochastic optimization. In: Mathematics of Operations Research. 2017 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 119-134.

Bibtex

@article{f54bb5c555ad4b1a991b996be28525db,
title = "Proper efficiency and tradeoffs in multiple criteria and stochastic optimization",
abstract = "The mathematical equivalence between linear scalarizations in multiobjective programming and expected-value functions in stochastic optimization suggests to investigate and establish further conceptual analogies between these two areas. In this paper, we focus on the notion of proper efficiency that allows us to provide a first comprehensive analysis of solution and scenario tradeoffs in stochastic optimization. In generalization of two standard characterizations of properly efficient solutions using weighted sums and augmented weighted Tchebycheff norms for finitely many criteria, we show that these results are generally false for infinitely many criteria. In particular, these observations motivate a slightly modified definition to prove that expected-value optimization over continuous random variables still yields bounded tradeoffs almost everywhere in general. Further consequences and practical implications of these results for decision-making under uncertainty and its related theory and methodology of multiple criteria, stochastic and robust optimization are discussed.",
keywords = "proper efficiency, tradeoffs, multicriteria optimization, multiobjective programming, stochastic optimization, stochastic programming, robust optimization, linear scalarization, weighted sum method, augmented Tchebycheff norm, expected value function, decision making under uncertainty",
author = "Alexander Engau",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1287/moor.2016.0796",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "119--134",
journal = "Mathematics of Operations Research",
issn = "0364-765X",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proper efficiency and tradeoffs in multiple criteria and stochastic optimization

AU - Engau, Alexander

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The mathematical equivalence between linear scalarizations in multiobjective programming and expected-value functions in stochastic optimization suggests to investigate and establish further conceptual analogies between these two areas. In this paper, we focus on the notion of proper efficiency that allows us to provide a first comprehensive analysis of solution and scenario tradeoffs in stochastic optimization. In generalization of two standard characterizations of properly efficient solutions using weighted sums and augmented weighted Tchebycheff norms for finitely many criteria, we show that these results are generally false for infinitely many criteria. In particular, these observations motivate a slightly modified definition to prove that expected-value optimization over continuous random variables still yields bounded tradeoffs almost everywhere in general. Further consequences and practical implications of these results for decision-making under uncertainty and its related theory and methodology of multiple criteria, stochastic and robust optimization are discussed.

AB - The mathematical equivalence between linear scalarizations in multiobjective programming and expected-value functions in stochastic optimization suggests to investigate and establish further conceptual analogies between these two areas. In this paper, we focus on the notion of proper efficiency that allows us to provide a first comprehensive analysis of solution and scenario tradeoffs in stochastic optimization. In generalization of two standard characterizations of properly efficient solutions using weighted sums and augmented weighted Tchebycheff norms for finitely many criteria, we show that these results are generally false for infinitely many criteria. In particular, these observations motivate a slightly modified definition to prove that expected-value optimization over continuous random variables still yields bounded tradeoffs almost everywhere in general. Further consequences and practical implications of these results for decision-making under uncertainty and its related theory and methodology of multiple criteria, stochastic and robust optimization are discussed.

KW - proper efficiency

KW - tradeoffs

KW - multicriteria optimization

KW - multiobjective programming

KW - stochastic optimization

KW - stochastic programming

KW - robust optimization

KW - linear scalarization

KW - weighted sum method

KW - augmented Tchebycheff norm

KW - expected value function

KW - decision making under uncertainty

U2 - 10.1287/moor.2016.0796

DO - 10.1287/moor.2016.0796

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 119

EP - 134

JO - Mathematics of Operations Research

JF - Mathematics of Operations Research

SN - 0364-765X

IS - 1

ER -