Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Psychological interventions for adults with bip...

Electronic data

  • Psychological_interventions_for_adults_with_bipolar_disorder

    Rights statement: This is an author-produced electronic version of an article accepted for publication in the British Journal of Psychiatry. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at http://bjp.rcpsych.org

    Accepted author manuscript, 146 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder : a systematic review and meta-analysis. / Oud, Matthijs; Mayo-Wilson, Evan; Braidwood, Ruth; Schulte, Peter; Jones, Steven; Morriss, Richard; Kupka, Ralph; Cuijpers, Pim; Kendall, Tim.

In: British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 208, No. 3, 03.2016, p. 213-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Oud, M, Mayo-Wilson, E, Braidwood, R, Schulte, P, Jones, S, Morriss, R, Kupka, R, Cuijpers, P & Kendall, T 2016, 'Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis', British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 208, no. 3, pp. 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123

APA

Oud, M., Mayo-Wilson, E., Braidwood, R., Schulte, P., Jones, S., Morriss, R., Kupka, R., Cuijpers, P., & Kendall, T. (2016). Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 208(3), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123

Vancouver

Oud M, Mayo-Wilson E, Braidwood R, Schulte P, Jones S, Morriss R et al. Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;208(3):213-222. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123

Author

Oud, Matthijs ; Mayo-Wilson, Evan ; Braidwood, Ruth ; Schulte, Peter ; Jones, Steven ; Morriss, Richard ; Kupka, Ralph ; Cuijpers, Pim ; Kendall, Tim. / Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder : a systematic review and meta-analysis. In: British Journal of Psychiatry. 2016 ; Vol. 208, No. 3. pp. 213-222.

Bibtex

@article{35e7148f3b9a4ab9a4edd04c199b4771,
title = "Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "BackgroundPsychological interventions may be beneficial in bipolar disorder.AimsTo evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder.MethodA systematic review of randomised controlled trials was conducted. Outcomes were meta-analysed using RevMan and confidence assessed using the GRADE method.ResultsWe included 55 trials with 6010 participants. Moderate-quality evidence associated individual psychological interventions with reduced relapses at post-treatment (risk ratio (RR) = 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.92) and follow-up (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.63–0.87), and collaborative care with a reduction in hospital admissions (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49–0.94). Low-quality evidence associated group interventions with fewer depression relapses at post-treatment and follow-up, and family psychoeducation with reduced symptoms of depression and mania.ConclusionsThere is evidence that psychological interventions are effective for people with bipolar disorder. Much of the evidence was of low or very low quality thereby limiting our conclusions. Further research should identify the most effective (and cost-effective) interventions for each phase of this disorder.",
author = "Matthijs Oud and Evan Mayo-Wilson and Ruth Braidwood and Peter Schulte and Steven Jones and Richard Morriss and Ralph Kupka and Pim Cuijpers and Tim Kendall",
note = "This is an author-produced electronic version of an article accepted for publication in the British Journal of Psychiatry. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at http://bjp.rcpsych.org",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123",
language = "English",
volume = "208",
pages = "213--222",
journal = "British Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0007-1250",
publisher = "Royal College of Psychiatrists",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder

T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Oud, Matthijs

AU - Mayo-Wilson, Evan

AU - Braidwood, Ruth

AU - Schulte, Peter

AU - Jones, Steven

AU - Morriss, Richard

AU - Kupka, Ralph

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Kendall, Tim

N1 - This is an author-produced electronic version of an article accepted for publication in the British Journal of Psychiatry. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at http://bjp.rcpsych.org

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - BackgroundPsychological interventions may be beneficial in bipolar disorder.AimsTo evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder.MethodA systematic review of randomised controlled trials was conducted. Outcomes were meta-analysed using RevMan and confidence assessed using the GRADE method.ResultsWe included 55 trials with 6010 participants. Moderate-quality evidence associated individual psychological interventions with reduced relapses at post-treatment (risk ratio (RR) = 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.92) and follow-up (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.63–0.87), and collaborative care with a reduction in hospital admissions (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49–0.94). Low-quality evidence associated group interventions with fewer depression relapses at post-treatment and follow-up, and family psychoeducation with reduced symptoms of depression and mania.ConclusionsThere is evidence that psychological interventions are effective for people with bipolar disorder. Much of the evidence was of low or very low quality thereby limiting our conclusions. Further research should identify the most effective (and cost-effective) interventions for each phase of this disorder.

AB - BackgroundPsychological interventions may be beneficial in bipolar disorder.AimsTo evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder.MethodA systematic review of randomised controlled trials was conducted. Outcomes were meta-analysed using RevMan and confidence assessed using the GRADE method.ResultsWe included 55 trials with 6010 participants. Moderate-quality evidence associated individual psychological interventions with reduced relapses at post-treatment (risk ratio (RR) = 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.92) and follow-up (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.63–0.87), and collaborative care with a reduction in hospital admissions (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49–0.94). Low-quality evidence associated group interventions with fewer depression relapses at post-treatment and follow-up, and family psychoeducation with reduced symptoms of depression and mania.ConclusionsThere is evidence that psychological interventions are effective for people with bipolar disorder. Much of the evidence was of low or very low quality thereby limiting our conclusions. Further research should identify the most effective (and cost-effective) interventions for each phase of this disorder.

U2 - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123

DO - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123

M3 - Journal article

VL - 208

SP - 213

EP - 222

JO - British Journal of Psychiatry

JF - British Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0007-1250

IS - 3

ER -