Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Pursuing “flexible commitment” as strategic amb...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Pursuing “flexible commitment” as strategic ambidexterity: An empirical justification in high technology firms

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Pursuing “flexible commitment” as strategic ambidexterity: An empirical justification in high technology firms. / Kouropalatis, Yiannis; Hughes, Paul; Morgan, Robert E.
In: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46, No. 10, 14.09.2012.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kouropalatis Y, Hughes P, Morgan RE. Pursuing “flexible commitment” as strategic ambidexterity: An empirical justification in high technology firms. European Journal of Marketing. 2012 Sept 14;46(10). doi: 10.1108/03090561211248099

Author

Kouropalatis, Yiannis ; Hughes, Paul ; Morgan, Robert E. / Pursuing “flexible commitment” as strategic ambidexterity : An empirical justification in high technology firms. In: European Journal of Marketing. 2012 ; Vol. 46, No. 10.

Bibtex

@article{3fab2ef519604fd3bffeeae6b08ff994,
title = "Pursuing “flexible commitment” as strategic ambidexterity: An empirical justification in high technology firms",
abstract = "PurposeFirms face high velocity conditions today that render product market strategies increasingly temporal. Strategic flexibility is critical for enabling rapid adaptation to a changing environment. At the same time, managerial commitment to product‐market strategy signifies the extent to which a manager comprehends and supports the strategy and reflects a necessary sense of ownership for any chosen product‐market strategy. The purpose of this paper, then, is to examine strategically ambidextrous firms through the twin lenses of flexibility and commitment to determine whether performance benefits accrue from such characteristics.Design/methodology/approachWhile traditional research streams examine strategic flexibility and commitment to product‐market strategy as opposing ends of a continuum, this paper adopts a broader perspective and examines strategic flexibility and commitment to product‐market strategy as elements of strategically ambidextrous firms. Cluster analysis is used to identify groups of high and low strategically ambidextrous firms.FindingsStrategically ambidextrous firms exhibit commitment to product‐market strategy, which enables the effective realisation of selected strategies through focusing managerial attention and firm resources, and strategic flexibility, which enables adaptation of the planned product‐market strategy based on feedback received, or abandonment followed by new strategic choices and impetus. The paper reveals that firms with high strategic ambidexterity exhibit significantly greater levels of strategic resources, decentralisation, product‐market strategy process effectiveness, and implementation effectiveness compared with low ambidexterity firms. Thus, strategic ambidexterity is revealed to endow significant performance benefits.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the need to examine ambidexterity as “flexible commitment”.",
author = "Yiannis Kouropalatis and Paul Hughes and Morgan, {Robert E.}",
year = "2012",
month = sep,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1108/03090561211248099",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
journal = "European Journal of Marketing",
issn = "0309-0566",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pursuing “flexible commitment” as strategic ambidexterity

T2 - An empirical justification in high technology firms

AU - Kouropalatis, Yiannis

AU - Hughes, Paul

AU - Morgan, Robert E.

PY - 2012/9/14

Y1 - 2012/9/14

N2 - PurposeFirms face high velocity conditions today that render product market strategies increasingly temporal. Strategic flexibility is critical for enabling rapid adaptation to a changing environment. At the same time, managerial commitment to product‐market strategy signifies the extent to which a manager comprehends and supports the strategy and reflects a necessary sense of ownership for any chosen product‐market strategy. The purpose of this paper, then, is to examine strategically ambidextrous firms through the twin lenses of flexibility and commitment to determine whether performance benefits accrue from such characteristics.Design/methodology/approachWhile traditional research streams examine strategic flexibility and commitment to product‐market strategy as opposing ends of a continuum, this paper adopts a broader perspective and examines strategic flexibility and commitment to product‐market strategy as elements of strategically ambidextrous firms. Cluster analysis is used to identify groups of high and low strategically ambidextrous firms.FindingsStrategically ambidextrous firms exhibit commitment to product‐market strategy, which enables the effective realisation of selected strategies through focusing managerial attention and firm resources, and strategic flexibility, which enables adaptation of the planned product‐market strategy based on feedback received, or abandonment followed by new strategic choices and impetus. The paper reveals that firms with high strategic ambidexterity exhibit significantly greater levels of strategic resources, decentralisation, product‐market strategy process effectiveness, and implementation effectiveness compared with low ambidexterity firms. Thus, strategic ambidexterity is revealed to endow significant performance benefits.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the need to examine ambidexterity as “flexible commitment”.

AB - PurposeFirms face high velocity conditions today that render product market strategies increasingly temporal. Strategic flexibility is critical for enabling rapid adaptation to a changing environment. At the same time, managerial commitment to product‐market strategy signifies the extent to which a manager comprehends and supports the strategy and reflects a necessary sense of ownership for any chosen product‐market strategy. The purpose of this paper, then, is to examine strategically ambidextrous firms through the twin lenses of flexibility and commitment to determine whether performance benefits accrue from such characteristics.Design/methodology/approachWhile traditional research streams examine strategic flexibility and commitment to product‐market strategy as opposing ends of a continuum, this paper adopts a broader perspective and examines strategic flexibility and commitment to product‐market strategy as elements of strategically ambidextrous firms. Cluster analysis is used to identify groups of high and low strategically ambidextrous firms.FindingsStrategically ambidextrous firms exhibit commitment to product‐market strategy, which enables the effective realisation of selected strategies through focusing managerial attention and firm resources, and strategic flexibility, which enables adaptation of the planned product‐market strategy based on feedback received, or abandonment followed by new strategic choices and impetus. The paper reveals that firms with high strategic ambidexterity exhibit significantly greater levels of strategic resources, decentralisation, product‐market strategy process effectiveness, and implementation effectiveness compared with low ambidexterity firms. Thus, strategic ambidexterity is revealed to endow significant performance benefits.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the need to examine ambidexterity as “flexible commitment”.

U2 - 10.1108/03090561211248099

DO - 10.1108/03090561211248099

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

JO - European Journal of Marketing

JF - European Journal of Marketing

SN - 0309-0566

IS - 10

ER -