Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Putting a price on empathy

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement. / Carter, Sarah.
In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 41, No. 10, 01.10.2015, p. 825–829.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Carter S. Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2015 Oct 1;41(10):825–829. Epub 2015 Sept 24. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102804

Author

Carter, Sarah. / Putting a price on empathy : against incentivising moral enhancement. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 10. pp. 825–829.

Bibtex

@article{dd00effe18d647598574e515973ba3b7,
title = "Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement",
abstract = "Concerns that people would be disinclined to voluntarily undergo moral enhancement have led to suggestions that an incentivised programme should be introduced to encourage participation. This paper argues that, while such measures do not necessarily result in coercion or undue inducement (issues with which one may typically associate the use of incentives in general), the use of incentives for this purpose may present a taboo trade-off. This is due to empirical research suggesting that those characteristics likely to be affected by moral enhancement are often perceived as fundamental to the self; therefore, any attempt to put a price on such traits would likely be deemed morally unacceptable by those who hold this view. A better approach to address the possible lack of participation may be to instead invest in alternative marketing strategies and remove incentives altogether.",
author = "Sarah Carter",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2015-102804",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "825–829",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Putting a price on empathy

T2 - against incentivising moral enhancement

AU - Carter, Sarah

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Concerns that people would be disinclined to voluntarily undergo moral enhancement have led to suggestions that an incentivised programme should be introduced to encourage participation. This paper argues that, while such measures do not necessarily result in coercion or undue inducement (issues with which one may typically associate the use of incentives in general), the use of incentives for this purpose may present a taboo trade-off. This is due to empirical research suggesting that those characteristics likely to be affected by moral enhancement are often perceived as fundamental to the self; therefore, any attempt to put a price on such traits would likely be deemed morally unacceptable by those who hold this view. A better approach to address the possible lack of participation may be to instead invest in alternative marketing strategies and remove incentives altogether.

AB - Concerns that people would be disinclined to voluntarily undergo moral enhancement have led to suggestions that an incentivised programme should be introduced to encourage participation. This paper argues that, while such measures do not necessarily result in coercion or undue inducement (issues with which one may typically associate the use of incentives in general), the use of incentives for this purpose may present a taboo trade-off. This is due to empirical research suggesting that those characteristics likely to be affected by moral enhancement are often perceived as fundamental to the self; therefore, any attempt to put a price on such traits would likely be deemed morally unacceptable by those who hold this view. A better approach to address the possible lack of participation may be to instead invest in alternative marketing strategies and remove incentives altogether.

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2015-102804

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2015-102804

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 825

EP - 829

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 10

ER -