Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Quantification of high latitude electric field ...

Research

Electronic data

  • grl14418

    Rights statement: Copyright (2001) American Geophysical Union

    Final published version, 561 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Quantification of high latitude electric field variability

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Quantification of high latitude electric field variability. / Crowley, G.; Hackert, C.L.
In: Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 28, No. 14, 15.07.2001, p. 2783-2786.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Crowley, G & Hackert, CL 2001, 'Quantification of high latitude electric field variability', Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 2783-2786. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012624

APA

Crowley, G., & Hackert, C. L. (2001). Quantification of high latitude electric field variability. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(14), 2783-2786. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012624

Vancouver

Crowley G, Hackert CL. Quantification of high latitude electric field variability. Geophysical Research Letters. 2001 Jul 15;28(14):2783-2786. doi: 10.1029/2000GL012624

Author

Crowley, G. ; Hackert, C.L. / Quantification of high latitude electric field variability. In: Geophysical Research Letters. 2001 ; Vol. 28, No. 14. pp. 2783-2786.

Bibtex

@article{e7b19d994bf84fb5b4a940427aa6ce33,
title = "Quantification of high latitude electric field variability",
abstract = "Variability in the high latitude electric field has been identified as a major contributor to global Joule heating. Electric field patterns from the Assimilative Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (AMIE) procedure are used to characterize the E-field temporal variability over the course of 18 hours. The standard deviation of the E-field magnitude on May 4, 1998 often exceeds the average value of the E-field magnitude. A significant fraction of this variability arises from oscillations with period less than one hour. This confirms that Joule heating calculations based on time-averaged E-fields may significantly under-predict the heating.",
keywords = "magnetometer",
author = "G. Crowley and C.L. Hackert",
note = "Copyright (2001) American Geophysical Union",
year = "2001",
month = jul,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1029/2000GL012624",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "2783--2786",
journal = "Geophysical Research Letters",
issn = "0094-8276",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd",
number = "14",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantification of high latitude electric field variability

AU - Crowley, G.

AU - Hackert, C.L.

N1 - Copyright (2001) American Geophysical Union

PY - 2001/7/15

Y1 - 2001/7/15

N2 - Variability in the high latitude electric field has been identified as a major contributor to global Joule heating. Electric field patterns from the Assimilative Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (AMIE) procedure are used to characterize the E-field temporal variability over the course of 18 hours. The standard deviation of the E-field magnitude on May 4, 1998 often exceeds the average value of the E-field magnitude. A significant fraction of this variability arises from oscillations with period less than one hour. This confirms that Joule heating calculations based on time-averaged E-fields may significantly under-predict the heating.

AB - Variability in the high latitude electric field has been identified as a major contributor to global Joule heating. Electric field patterns from the Assimilative Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (AMIE) procedure are used to characterize the E-field temporal variability over the course of 18 hours. The standard deviation of the E-field magnitude on May 4, 1998 often exceeds the average value of the E-field magnitude. A significant fraction of this variability arises from oscillations with period less than one hour. This confirms that Joule heating calculations based on time-averaged E-fields may significantly under-predict the heating.

KW - magnetometer

U2 - 10.1029/2000GL012624

DO - 10.1029/2000GL012624

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 2783

EP - 2786

JO - Geophysical Research Letters

JF - Geophysical Research Letters

SN - 0094-8276

IS - 14

ER -