Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Questioning the IT artefact: User practices tha...
View graph of relations

Questioning the IT artefact: User practices that can, could, and cannot be supported in packaged-software designs

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Questioning the IT artefact: User practices that can, could, and cannot be supported in packaged-software designs. / Chiasson, M; Green, L W.
In: European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 5, 10.2007, p. 542-554.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chiasson M, Green LW. Questioning the IT artefact: User practices that can, could, and cannot be supported in packaged-software designs. European Journal of Information Systems. 2007 Oct;16(5):542-554. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000701

Author

Chiasson, M ; Green, L W. / Questioning the IT artefact: User practices that can, could, and cannot be supported in packaged-software designs. In: European Journal of Information Systems. 2007 ; Vol. 16, No. 5. pp. 542-554.

Bibtex

@article{1aab14e3722c496faded7f249201ac03,
title = "Questioning the IT artefact: User practices that can, could, and cannot be supported in packaged-software designs",
abstract = "The purchase of packaged software has brought new opportunities and challenges to the development of information systems. An important question for packaged software consumers is how a software package will support, change or inhibit practices. To address this question, our paper focuses on the decisions made by a team developing four different software prototypes, with increasingly relaxed constraints on data content and structure. Each prototype significantly enlarged the number of health promotion planners that could be supported by the software. Consistent with the literature, the software designers balanced specificity (constraint) and generality (opening) in the software to incorporate a desire to serve a broad audience, and a need to be relevant to various sub-groups within this audience. Given a detailed knowledge of the software artefact, including the data content and structural choices made by designers, we hope to enable software consumers to question IT artefacts and their spokespeople, so they can make active and informed choices about software generality and specificity. We also suggest that this questioning process is shared across both customised and packaged software, and that the inscription of technology by designers may be either deterministic and detailed, or emergent and general. The implications for packaged software research and practice are considered.",
keywords = "packaged software, design , selection , specificity , planning",
author = "M Chiasson and Green, {L W}",
year = "2007",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000701",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "542--554",
journal = "European Journal of Information Systems",
issn = "0960-085X",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Questioning the IT artefact: User practices that can, could, and cannot be supported in packaged-software designs

AU - Chiasson, M

AU - Green, L W

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - The purchase of packaged software has brought new opportunities and challenges to the development of information systems. An important question for packaged software consumers is how a software package will support, change or inhibit practices. To address this question, our paper focuses on the decisions made by a team developing four different software prototypes, with increasingly relaxed constraints on data content and structure. Each prototype significantly enlarged the number of health promotion planners that could be supported by the software. Consistent with the literature, the software designers balanced specificity (constraint) and generality (opening) in the software to incorporate a desire to serve a broad audience, and a need to be relevant to various sub-groups within this audience. Given a detailed knowledge of the software artefact, including the data content and structural choices made by designers, we hope to enable software consumers to question IT artefacts and their spokespeople, so they can make active and informed choices about software generality and specificity. We also suggest that this questioning process is shared across both customised and packaged software, and that the inscription of technology by designers may be either deterministic and detailed, or emergent and general. The implications for packaged software research and practice are considered.

AB - The purchase of packaged software has brought new opportunities and challenges to the development of information systems. An important question for packaged software consumers is how a software package will support, change or inhibit practices. To address this question, our paper focuses on the decisions made by a team developing four different software prototypes, with increasingly relaxed constraints on data content and structure. Each prototype significantly enlarged the number of health promotion planners that could be supported by the software. Consistent with the literature, the software designers balanced specificity (constraint) and generality (opening) in the software to incorporate a desire to serve a broad audience, and a need to be relevant to various sub-groups within this audience. Given a detailed knowledge of the software artefact, including the data content and structural choices made by designers, we hope to enable software consumers to question IT artefacts and their spokespeople, so they can make active and informed choices about software generality and specificity. We also suggest that this questioning process is shared across both customised and packaged software, and that the inscription of technology by designers may be either deterministic and detailed, or emergent and general. The implications for packaged software research and practice are considered.

KW - packaged software

KW - design

KW - selection

KW - specificity

KW - planning

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000701

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000701

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 542

EP - 554

JO - European Journal of Information Systems

JF - European Journal of Information Systems

SN - 0960-085X

IS - 5

ER -