Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Race and genomics

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

Race and genomics

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Race and genomics. / Tutton, Richard; Bliss, Catherine.
Encyclopedia of applied ethics . ed. / Ruth Chadwick. 2nd ed. ed. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press, 2012. p. 699-704.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Tutton, R & Bliss, C 2012, Race and genomics. in R Chadwick (ed.), Encyclopedia of applied ethics . 2nd ed. edn, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00431-2

APA

Tutton, R., & Bliss, C. (2012). Race and genomics. In R. Chadwick (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied ethics (2nd ed. ed., pp. 699-704). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00431-2

Vancouver

Tutton R, Bliss C. Race and genomics. In Chadwick R, editor, Encyclopedia of applied ethics . 2nd ed. ed. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press. 2012. p. 699-704 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00431-2

Author

Tutton, Richard ; Bliss, Catherine. / Race and genomics. Encyclopedia of applied ethics . editor / Ruth Chadwick. 2nd ed. ed. San Diego : Elsevier Academic Press, 2012. pp. 699-704

Bibtex

@inbook{117eb9767a8b4d83b43668512149aaa3,
title = "Race and genomics",
abstract = "In light of contemporary scientific developments in genomics, one question that has occupied scholars is whether today we are seeing the revival of discredited biological notions of racial difference, or something quite different – a refashioning of race and the emergence of novel forms of politics and identity formation that supersede or redefine older notions of biology and race. The article provides an overview of conceptual debates about the meaning of race and identifies four principal ways in which scholars have understood the implications for developments in science for our understanding of race today. These are characterized in the following terms: (1) revival, (2) refashioning, (3) alignment, and (4) ambivalence. The article shows how these conceptual debates also impinge on normative questions about health inequalities in society.",
keywords = "Ancestry testing, Biology , Biopolitics , Genomics , Health disparities , Pharmaceuticals , Science",
author = "Richard Tutton and Catherine Bliss",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00431-2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780123739322",
pages = "699--704",
editor = "Ruth Chadwick",
booktitle = "Encyclopedia of applied ethics",
publisher = "Elsevier Academic Press",
edition = "2nd ed.",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Race and genomics

AU - Tutton, Richard

AU - Bliss, Catherine

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In light of contemporary scientific developments in genomics, one question that has occupied scholars is whether today we are seeing the revival of discredited biological notions of racial difference, or something quite different – a refashioning of race and the emergence of novel forms of politics and identity formation that supersede or redefine older notions of biology and race. The article provides an overview of conceptual debates about the meaning of race and identifies four principal ways in which scholars have understood the implications for developments in science for our understanding of race today. These are characterized in the following terms: (1) revival, (2) refashioning, (3) alignment, and (4) ambivalence. The article shows how these conceptual debates also impinge on normative questions about health inequalities in society.

AB - In light of contemporary scientific developments in genomics, one question that has occupied scholars is whether today we are seeing the revival of discredited biological notions of racial difference, or something quite different – a refashioning of race and the emergence of novel forms of politics and identity formation that supersede or redefine older notions of biology and race. The article provides an overview of conceptual debates about the meaning of race and identifies four principal ways in which scholars have understood the implications for developments in science for our understanding of race today. These are characterized in the following terms: (1) revival, (2) refashioning, (3) alignment, and (4) ambivalence. The article shows how these conceptual debates also impinge on normative questions about health inequalities in society.

KW - Ancestry testing

KW - Biology

KW - Biopolitics

KW - Genomics

KW - Health disparities

KW - Pharmaceuticals

KW - Science

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00431-2

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00431-2

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780123739322

SP - 699

EP - 704

BT - Encyclopedia of applied ethics

A2 - Chadwick, Ruth

PB - Elsevier Academic Press

CY - San Diego

ER -