Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reasonability and the linguistic division of la...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Reasonability and the linguistic division of labor in institutional work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Reasonability and the linguistic division of labor in institutional work. / Schildt, H. A.; Mantere, S.; Vaara, E.

In: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 20, No. 1, 03.2011, p. 82-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Schildt, HA, Mantere, S & Vaara, E 2011, 'Reasonability and the linguistic division of labor in institutional work', Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387226

APA

Vancouver

Author

Schildt, H. A. ; Mantere, S. ; Vaara, E. / Reasonability and the linguistic division of labor in institutional work. In: Journal of Management Inquiry. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 82-86.

Bibtex

@article{481a27e377cd4df4b9f18787364da9b7,
title = "Reasonability and the linguistic division of labor in institutional work",
abstract = "We examine institutional work from a discursive perspective and argue that reasonability, the existence of acceptable justifying reasons for beliefs and practices, is a key part of legitimation. Drawing on philosophy of language, we maintain that institutional work takes place in the context of {\textquoteleft}space of reasons{\textquoteright} determined by widely held assumptions about what is reasonable and what is not. We argue that reasonability provides the main contextual constraint of institutional work, its major outcome, and a key trigger for actors to engage in it. We draw on Hilary Putnam{\textquoteright}s concept {\textquoteleft}division of linguistic labor{\textquoteright} to highlight the specialized distribution of knowledge and authority in defining valid ways of reasoning. In this view, individuals use institutionalized vocabularies to reason about their choices and understand their context with limited understanding of how and why these structures have become what they are. We highlight the need to understand how professions and other actors establish and maintain the criteria of reasoning in various areas of expertise through discursive institutional work. ",
author = "Schildt, {H. A.} and S. Mantere and E. Vaara",
year = "2011",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1177/1056492610387226",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "82--86",
journal = "Journal of Management Inquiry",
issn = "1056-4926",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasonability and the linguistic division of labor in institutional work

AU - Schildt, H. A.

AU - Mantere, S.

AU - Vaara, E.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - We examine institutional work from a discursive perspective and argue that reasonability, the existence of acceptable justifying reasons for beliefs and practices, is a key part of legitimation. Drawing on philosophy of language, we maintain that institutional work takes place in the context of ‘space of reasons’ determined by widely held assumptions about what is reasonable and what is not. We argue that reasonability provides the main contextual constraint of institutional work, its major outcome, and a key trigger for actors to engage in it. We draw on Hilary Putnam’s concept ‘division of linguistic labor’ to highlight the specialized distribution of knowledge and authority in defining valid ways of reasoning. In this view, individuals use institutionalized vocabularies to reason about their choices and understand their context with limited understanding of how and why these structures have become what they are. We highlight the need to understand how professions and other actors establish and maintain the criteria of reasoning in various areas of expertise through discursive institutional work.

AB - We examine institutional work from a discursive perspective and argue that reasonability, the existence of acceptable justifying reasons for beliefs and practices, is a key part of legitimation. Drawing on philosophy of language, we maintain that institutional work takes place in the context of ‘space of reasons’ determined by widely held assumptions about what is reasonable and what is not. We argue that reasonability provides the main contextual constraint of institutional work, its major outcome, and a key trigger for actors to engage in it. We draw on Hilary Putnam’s concept ‘division of linguistic labor’ to highlight the specialized distribution of knowledge and authority in defining valid ways of reasoning. In this view, individuals use institutionalized vocabularies to reason about their choices and understand their context with limited understanding of how and why these structures have become what they are. We highlight the need to understand how professions and other actors establish and maintain the criteria of reasoning in various areas of expertise through discursive institutional work.

U2 - 10.1177/1056492610387226

DO - 10.1177/1056492610387226

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 82

EP - 86

JO - Journal of Management Inquiry

JF - Journal of Management Inquiry

SN - 1056-4926

IS - 1

ER -