Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Rebels without a clause: towards an institution...

Research

Links

View graph of relations

Rebels without a clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Rebels without a clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. / Park, Chris.
In: Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 28, No. 3, 08.2004, p. 291-306.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Park, C 2004, 'Rebels without a clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students.', Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 291-306. <http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713623356~db=all~order=page>

APA

Park, C. (2004). Rebels without a clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(3), 291-306. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713623356~db=all~order=page

Vancouver

Park C. Rebels without a clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2004 Aug;28(3):291-306.

Author

Park, Chris. / Rebels without a clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. In: Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2004 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 291-306.

Bibtex

@article{7f71fe752f7349509d9b306f89c21f90,
title = "Rebels without a clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students.",
abstract = "This paper explores why an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students is necessary and it outlines the main ingredients of such a framework that has been developed at Lancaster University. It defines plagiarism as a form of academic malpractice and frames it as a breach of academic integrity. The framework places a strong emphasis on prevention and education, backed up by robust and transparent procedures for detecting and punishing plagiarism. It is informed by a number of core pillars, including transparency, ownership, responsibility, academic integrity, compatibility with the institution's academic culture, focus on prevention and deterrence and support for and development of students' skills. The key criteria in evaluating the usefulness of such an institutional framework are transparency, appropriateness, fairness and consistency.",
author = "Chris Park",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28 (3), 2004, {\textcopyright} Informa Plc",
year = "2004",
month = aug,
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "291--306",
journal = "Journal of Further and Higher Education",
issn = "0309-877X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rebels without a clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students.

AU - Park, Chris

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28 (3), 2004, © Informa Plc

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - This paper explores why an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students is necessary and it outlines the main ingredients of such a framework that has been developed at Lancaster University. It defines plagiarism as a form of academic malpractice and frames it as a breach of academic integrity. The framework places a strong emphasis on prevention and education, backed up by robust and transparent procedures for detecting and punishing plagiarism. It is informed by a number of core pillars, including transparency, ownership, responsibility, academic integrity, compatibility with the institution's academic culture, focus on prevention and deterrence and support for and development of students' skills. The key criteria in evaluating the usefulness of such an institutional framework are transparency, appropriateness, fairness and consistency.

AB - This paper explores why an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students is necessary and it outlines the main ingredients of such a framework that has been developed at Lancaster University. It defines plagiarism as a form of academic malpractice and frames it as a breach of academic integrity. The framework places a strong emphasis on prevention and education, backed up by robust and transparent procedures for detecting and punishing plagiarism. It is informed by a number of core pillars, including transparency, ownership, responsibility, academic integrity, compatibility with the institution's academic culture, focus on prevention and deterrence and support for and development of students' skills. The key criteria in evaluating the usefulness of such an institutional framework are transparency, appropriateness, fairness and consistency.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 291

EP - 306

JO - Journal of Further and Higher Education

JF - Journal of Further and Higher Education

SN - 0309-877X

IS - 3

ER -