Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Recalcitrance, compliance and the presentation ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Recalcitrance, compliance and the presentation of self: Exploring the concept of organisational misbehaviour in an English local authority child protection service

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Recalcitrance, compliance and the presentation of self : Exploring the concept of organisational misbehaviour in an English local authority child protection service. / Leigh, J.

In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 79, 08.2017, p. 612-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{ffe3230aecb34153bb06f6c8df51f35f,
title = "Recalcitrance, compliance and the presentation of self: Exploring the concept of organisational misbehaviour in an English local authority child protection service",
abstract = "This article examines how social workers reinterpreted certain legal requirements to meet their organisation's performance targets. Using an ethnographic approach, I combine organisational misbehaviour theory and Goffmanesque conceptions of dramaturgy to explore the regional activity of one team in a statutory agency. I argue that singly neither misbehaviour theory nor dramaturgical performances account for our understanding of why workers respond differently to organisational changes in a neo-liberalist environment. This study differs from current literature by shifting emphasis away from workers either resisting or conforming with organisational directives on to the ways in which individuals and collectives devise methods which instead give the appearance of co-operation. I demonstrate how workers disguised their resistance in an attempt to achieve potentially unachievable objectives and in turn avoid disciplinary action. I conclude by suggesting that applying Goffman to studies of organisation can advance scholars' understanding of how certain individuals respond to change and might come to be defined as loyal and compliant. This approach can also encourage discussions relating to the concept of recalcitrance and whether it is developed, and enforced, by those in powerful positions on the basis of their own desire to be well regarded by others. {\textcopyright} 2017",
keywords = "Compliance, Ethnography, Goffman, Organisational misbehaviour, Recalcitrance, Social work, child, child protection, ethnography, female, human, human experiment, male, social work, worker",
author = "J. Leigh",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.07.016",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "612--619",
journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
issn = "0190-7409",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recalcitrance, compliance and the presentation of self

T2 - Exploring the concept of organisational misbehaviour in an English local authority child protection service

AU - Leigh, J.

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - This article examines how social workers reinterpreted certain legal requirements to meet their organisation's performance targets. Using an ethnographic approach, I combine organisational misbehaviour theory and Goffmanesque conceptions of dramaturgy to explore the regional activity of one team in a statutory agency. I argue that singly neither misbehaviour theory nor dramaturgical performances account for our understanding of why workers respond differently to organisational changes in a neo-liberalist environment. This study differs from current literature by shifting emphasis away from workers either resisting or conforming with organisational directives on to the ways in which individuals and collectives devise methods which instead give the appearance of co-operation. I demonstrate how workers disguised their resistance in an attempt to achieve potentially unachievable objectives and in turn avoid disciplinary action. I conclude by suggesting that applying Goffman to studies of organisation can advance scholars' understanding of how certain individuals respond to change and might come to be defined as loyal and compliant. This approach can also encourage discussions relating to the concept of recalcitrance and whether it is developed, and enforced, by those in powerful positions on the basis of their own desire to be well regarded by others. © 2017

AB - This article examines how social workers reinterpreted certain legal requirements to meet their organisation's performance targets. Using an ethnographic approach, I combine organisational misbehaviour theory and Goffmanesque conceptions of dramaturgy to explore the regional activity of one team in a statutory agency. I argue that singly neither misbehaviour theory nor dramaturgical performances account for our understanding of why workers respond differently to organisational changes in a neo-liberalist environment. This study differs from current literature by shifting emphasis away from workers either resisting or conforming with organisational directives on to the ways in which individuals and collectives devise methods which instead give the appearance of co-operation. I demonstrate how workers disguised their resistance in an attempt to achieve potentially unachievable objectives and in turn avoid disciplinary action. I conclude by suggesting that applying Goffman to studies of organisation can advance scholars' understanding of how certain individuals respond to change and might come to be defined as loyal and compliant. This approach can also encourage discussions relating to the concept of recalcitrance and whether it is developed, and enforced, by those in powerful positions on the basis of their own desire to be well regarded by others. © 2017

KW - Compliance

KW - Ethnography

KW - Goffman

KW - Organisational misbehaviour

KW - Recalcitrance

KW - Social work

KW - child

KW - child protection

KW - ethnography

KW - female

KW - human

KW - human experiment

KW - male

KW - social work

KW - worker

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.07.016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 79

SP - 612

EP - 619

JO - Children and Youth Services Review

JF - Children and Youth Services Review

SN - 0190-7409

ER -