Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Re-Claiming Babylon: Epistemic Violence and Rhe...
View graph of relations

Re-Claiming Babylon: Epistemic Violence and Rhetorical Sovereignty in Iraq Discourse

Research output: Exhibits, objects and web-based outputsBlogpeer-review

Published

Standard

Re-Claiming Babylon: Epistemic Violence and Rhetorical Sovereignty in Iraq Discourse. Ali Al-Hassani, Ruba (Artist). 2024.

Research output: Exhibits, objects and web-based outputsBlogpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@misc{dbbc1e5d556f4edc9df7057ecd575985,
title = "Re-Claiming Babylon: Epistemic Violence and Rhetorical Sovereignty in Iraq Discourse",
abstract = "For two decades after the U.S.-led invasion, White people have been dominating English-language discourse on Iraq. Despite effort by some Iraqis in the diaspora to guide the conversation, White men and women in government, think-tanks, and academia expect to lead the conversation. They sideline pluralistic Iraqi voices in favour of a West-centric perspective and through the prism of a U.S.-Iran proxy war. This type of conversation externalises and reduces Iraqis to a passive polity if not collateral damage—rhetoric reminiscent of the 2003 invasion.",
keywords = "Iraq, Epistemology, Violence, War, Sovereignty, Narratives",
author = "{Ali Al-Hassani}, Ruba",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "14",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - ADVS

T1 - Re-Claiming Babylon: Epistemic Violence and Rhetorical Sovereignty in Iraq Discourse

A2 - Ali Al-Hassani, Ruba

PY - 2024/5/14

Y1 - 2024/5/14

N2 - For two decades after the U.S.-led invasion, White people have been dominating English-language discourse on Iraq. Despite effort by some Iraqis in the diaspora to guide the conversation, White men and women in government, think-tanks, and academia expect to lead the conversation. They sideline pluralistic Iraqi voices in favour of a West-centric perspective and through the prism of a U.S.-Iran proxy war. This type of conversation externalises and reduces Iraqis to a passive polity if not collateral damage—rhetoric reminiscent of the 2003 invasion.

AB - For two decades after the U.S.-led invasion, White people have been dominating English-language discourse on Iraq. Despite effort by some Iraqis in the diaspora to guide the conversation, White men and women in government, think-tanks, and academia expect to lead the conversation. They sideline pluralistic Iraqi voices in favour of a West-centric perspective and through the prism of a U.S.-Iran proxy war. This type of conversation externalises and reduces Iraqis to a passive polity if not collateral damage—rhetoric reminiscent of the 2003 invasion.

KW - Iraq

KW - Epistemology

KW - Violence

KW - War

KW - Sovereignty

KW - Narratives

M3 - Blog

ER -