Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Recognising “open innovation” in HEI‐industry i...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Recognising “open innovation” in HEI‐industry interaction for knowledge transfer and exchange

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Recognising “open innovation” in HEI‐industry interaction for knowledge transfer and exchange. / Robinson, Sarah Katrina; Johnston, Lorraine; Lockett, Nigel Jonathan.
In: International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2010, p. 540-560.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Robinson SK, Johnston L, Lockett NJ. Recognising “open innovation” in HEI‐industry interaction for knowledge transfer and exchange. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research. 2010;16(6):540-560. doi: 10.1108/13552551011082498

Author

Bibtex

@article{cb845729d2094c60bd8e3d8c9a8501b0,
title = "Recognising “open innovation” in HEI‐industry interaction for knowledge transfer and exchange",
abstract = "Purpose – This paper aims to stimulate debate among academic and policymaking communities as to understanding the importance of social processes and open innovation contexts within existing models of knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) between higher education institutions (HEIs) and industry.Design/methodology/approach – This research was conducted through a number of case studies connected to UK HEIs and through extensive interviews with representatives of HEI, industry and policy makers over a two‐year period.Findings – The results confirm that social processes are often under‐explored in collaborative HEI‐industry settings. The study identified seven emerging themes which are important to HEI‐industry relationships: the importance of network intermediaries; flexibility, openness and connectivity of network structures; encouraging network participation; building trust in relationships through mutual understanding; active network learning; strengthening cooperation through capacity building; and culture change.Practical implications – This research raises implications for policymakers and practitioners engaged in developing KTE collaborative activities. The paper argues for greater attention to be placed upon the social processes that affect collaborative innovation and working. Policymaking in particular needs to take account of these processes as they are neither easy to establish nor sustain.Originality/value – The paper contributes to the literature on HEI‐industry interactions for enhanced KTE activity and partnership working which demonstrates value to wider scholarly and practitioner readership. In the context of “open innovation”, the paper argues in favour of greater attention to be paid to the social processes involved in engaging HEI academics with industry professionals. Moreover, the paper further contributes to wider perspectives on the importance of international HEI‐industry research activities.",
keywords = "Knowledge transfer, Knowledge sharing, Social processes, Higher education, Organizations",
author = "Robinson, {Sarah Katrina} and Lorraine Johnston and Lockett, {Nigel Jonathan}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1108/13552551011082498",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "540--560",
journal = "International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research",
issn = "1355-2554",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recognising “open innovation” in HEI‐industry interaction for knowledge transfer and exchange

AU - Robinson, Sarah Katrina

AU - Johnston, Lorraine

AU - Lockett, Nigel Jonathan

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Purpose – This paper aims to stimulate debate among academic and policymaking communities as to understanding the importance of social processes and open innovation contexts within existing models of knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) between higher education institutions (HEIs) and industry.Design/methodology/approach – This research was conducted through a number of case studies connected to UK HEIs and through extensive interviews with representatives of HEI, industry and policy makers over a two‐year period.Findings – The results confirm that social processes are often under‐explored in collaborative HEI‐industry settings. The study identified seven emerging themes which are important to HEI‐industry relationships: the importance of network intermediaries; flexibility, openness and connectivity of network structures; encouraging network participation; building trust in relationships through mutual understanding; active network learning; strengthening cooperation through capacity building; and culture change.Practical implications – This research raises implications for policymakers and practitioners engaged in developing KTE collaborative activities. The paper argues for greater attention to be placed upon the social processes that affect collaborative innovation and working. Policymaking in particular needs to take account of these processes as they are neither easy to establish nor sustain.Originality/value – The paper contributes to the literature on HEI‐industry interactions for enhanced KTE activity and partnership working which demonstrates value to wider scholarly and practitioner readership. In the context of “open innovation”, the paper argues in favour of greater attention to be paid to the social processes involved in engaging HEI academics with industry professionals. Moreover, the paper further contributes to wider perspectives on the importance of international HEI‐industry research activities.

AB - Purpose – This paper aims to stimulate debate among academic and policymaking communities as to understanding the importance of social processes and open innovation contexts within existing models of knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) between higher education institutions (HEIs) and industry.Design/methodology/approach – This research was conducted through a number of case studies connected to UK HEIs and through extensive interviews with representatives of HEI, industry and policy makers over a two‐year period.Findings – The results confirm that social processes are often under‐explored in collaborative HEI‐industry settings. The study identified seven emerging themes which are important to HEI‐industry relationships: the importance of network intermediaries; flexibility, openness and connectivity of network structures; encouraging network participation; building trust in relationships through mutual understanding; active network learning; strengthening cooperation through capacity building; and culture change.Practical implications – This research raises implications for policymakers and practitioners engaged in developing KTE collaborative activities. The paper argues for greater attention to be placed upon the social processes that affect collaborative innovation and working. Policymaking in particular needs to take account of these processes as they are neither easy to establish nor sustain.Originality/value – The paper contributes to the literature on HEI‐industry interactions for enhanced KTE activity and partnership working which demonstrates value to wider scholarly and practitioner readership. In the context of “open innovation”, the paper argues in favour of greater attention to be paid to the social processes involved in engaging HEI academics with industry professionals. Moreover, the paper further contributes to wider perspectives on the importance of international HEI‐industry research activities.

KW - Knowledge transfer

KW - Knowledge sharing

KW - Social processes

KW - Higher education

KW - Organizations

U2 - 10.1108/13552551011082498

DO - 10.1108/13552551011082498

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 540

EP - 560

JO - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research

JF - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research

SN - 1355-2554

IS - 6

ER -