Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Recognition and the politics of human(e) desire.
View graph of relations

Recognition and the politics of human(e) desire.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Recognition and the politics of human(e) desire. / Yar, Majid.
In: Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 18, No. 2-3, 06.2001, p. 57-76.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Yar, M 2001, 'Recognition and the politics of human(e) desire.', Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 18, no. 2-3, pp. 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051788

APA

Yar, M. (2001). Recognition and the politics of human(e) desire. Theory, Culture and Society, 18(2-3), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051788

Vancouver

Yar M. Recognition and the politics of human(e) desire. Theory, Culture and Society. 2001 Jun;18(2-3):57-76. doi: 10.1177/02632760122051788

Author

Yar, Majid. / Recognition and the politics of human(e) desire. In: Theory, Culture and Society. 2001 ; Vol. 18, No. 2-3. pp. 57-76.

Bibtex

@article{9c150e0b2ebe4b778f52beb46544ee58,
title = "Recognition and the politics of human(e) desire.",
abstract = "In the course of the last 30 years, feminist theories of gender have shifted from quasi-Marxist, labor-centered conceptions to putatively {\textquoteleft}post-Marxist{\textquoteright} cultureand identity-based conceptions. Reflecting a broader political move from redistribution to recognition, this shift has been double edged. On the one hand, it has broadened feminist politics to encompass legitimate issues of representation, identity and difference. Yet, in the context of an ascendant neoliberalism, feminist struggles for recognition may be serving less to enrich struggles for redistribution than to displace the latter. Thus, instead of arriving at a broader, richer paradigm that could encompass both redistribution and recognition, feminists appear to have traded one truncated paradigm for another – a truncated economism for a truncated culturalism. This article aims to resist that trend. I propose an anaysis of gender that is broad enough to house the full range of feminist concerns, those central to the old socialistfeminism as well as those rooted in the cultural turn. I also propose a correspondingly broad conception of justice, capable of encompassing both distribution and recognition, and a non-identitarian account of recognition, capable of synergizing with redistribution. I conclude by examining some practical problems that arise when we try to envision institutional reforms that could redress gender maldistribution and gender misrecognition simultaneously.",
keywords = "identity • multiculturalism • parity • participation • redistribution • status",
author = "Majid Yar",
year = "2001",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1177/02632760122051788",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "57--76",
journal = "Theory, Culture and Society",
issn = "1460-3616",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recognition and the politics of human(e) desire.

AU - Yar, Majid

PY - 2001/6

Y1 - 2001/6

N2 - In the course of the last 30 years, feminist theories of gender have shifted from quasi-Marxist, labor-centered conceptions to putatively ‘post-Marxist’ cultureand identity-based conceptions. Reflecting a broader political move from redistribution to recognition, this shift has been double edged. On the one hand, it has broadened feminist politics to encompass legitimate issues of representation, identity and difference. Yet, in the context of an ascendant neoliberalism, feminist struggles for recognition may be serving less to enrich struggles for redistribution than to displace the latter. Thus, instead of arriving at a broader, richer paradigm that could encompass both redistribution and recognition, feminists appear to have traded one truncated paradigm for another – a truncated economism for a truncated culturalism. This article aims to resist that trend. I propose an anaysis of gender that is broad enough to house the full range of feminist concerns, those central to the old socialistfeminism as well as those rooted in the cultural turn. I also propose a correspondingly broad conception of justice, capable of encompassing both distribution and recognition, and a non-identitarian account of recognition, capable of synergizing with redistribution. I conclude by examining some practical problems that arise when we try to envision institutional reforms that could redress gender maldistribution and gender misrecognition simultaneously.

AB - In the course of the last 30 years, feminist theories of gender have shifted from quasi-Marxist, labor-centered conceptions to putatively ‘post-Marxist’ cultureand identity-based conceptions. Reflecting a broader political move from redistribution to recognition, this shift has been double edged. On the one hand, it has broadened feminist politics to encompass legitimate issues of representation, identity and difference. Yet, in the context of an ascendant neoliberalism, feminist struggles for recognition may be serving less to enrich struggles for redistribution than to displace the latter. Thus, instead of arriving at a broader, richer paradigm that could encompass both redistribution and recognition, feminists appear to have traded one truncated paradigm for another – a truncated economism for a truncated culturalism. This article aims to resist that trend. I propose an anaysis of gender that is broad enough to house the full range of feminist concerns, those central to the old socialistfeminism as well as those rooted in the cultural turn. I also propose a correspondingly broad conception of justice, capable of encompassing both distribution and recognition, and a non-identitarian account of recognition, capable of synergizing with redistribution. I conclude by examining some practical problems that arise when we try to envision institutional reforms that could redress gender maldistribution and gender misrecognition simultaneously.

KW - identity • multiculturalism • parity • participation • redistribution • status

U2 - 10.1177/02632760122051788

DO - 10.1177/02632760122051788

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 57

EP - 76

JO - Theory, Culture and Society

JF - Theory, Culture and Society

SN - 1460-3616

IS - 2-3

ER -