Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reconceiving the Conceivability Argument for Du...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Reconceiving the Conceivability Argument for Dualism in the Philosophy of Mind

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Reconceiving the Conceivability Argument for Dualism in the Philosophy of Mind. / Maung, Hane Htut.
In: Synthesis philosophica, Vol. 38, No. 1, 25.09.2023, p. 157-181.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Maung HH. Reconceiving the Conceivability Argument for Dualism in the Philosophy of Mind. Synthesis philosophica. 2023 Sept 25;38(1):157-181. doi: 10.21464/sp38109

Author

Maung, Hane Htut. / Reconceiving the Conceivability Argument for Dualism in the Philosophy of Mind. In: Synthesis philosophica. 2023 ; Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. 157-181.

Bibtex

@article{cdb2e26a8eb240428f2a3500b566acbb,
title = "Reconceiving the Conceivability Argument for Dualism in the Philosophy of Mind",
abstract = "In the philosophical literature on consciousness and the mind-body problem, the conceivability argument against physicalism is usually taken to support a form of dualism between physicality and phenomenality. Usually, the discussion focuses on the qualitative character of experience, which is what the phenomenal feel of a given experience is like. By contrast, the subjective character of experience, or its individuation to a given first-person subject, tends to be set aside. The aim of this paper is to present a new and more robust version of the conceivability argument for dualism that appeals to the subjective character of experience. Drawing on insights by philosophers in the phenomenological tradition, I conceptualise the first-person subjective character of experience as a transcendental condition of possibility for phenomenality that cannot be reduced to third-person facts about the physical world. Given this, the mind-body problem as it pertains to consciousness does not merely concern the inability of the set of physical facts about a brain state to capture the qualitative character of experience, but concerns the existential issue of why this brain state is accompanied by first-person subjectivity at all. This allows us to reconceive the conceivability argument in a way that presents a stronger case for dualism than the traditional version of the argument.",
keywords = "consciousness, philosophical phenomenology, subjectivity, experiential dimension, dualism, conceivability argument",
author = "Maung, {Hane Htut}",
year = "2023",
month = sep,
day = "25",
doi = "10.21464/sp38109",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "157--181",
journal = "Synthesis philosophica",
issn = "0352-7875",
publisher = "Croatian Philosophical Society (Hrvatsko filozofsko drustvo)",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconceiving the Conceivability Argument for Dualism in the Philosophy of Mind

AU - Maung, Hane Htut

PY - 2023/9/25

Y1 - 2023/9/25

N2 - In the philosophical literature on consciousness and the mind-body problem, the conceivability argument against physicalism is usually taken to support a form of dualism between physicality and phenomenality. Usually, the discussion focuses on the qualitative character of experience, which is what the phenomenal feel of a given experience is like. By contrast, the subjective character of experience, or its individuation to a given first-person subject, tends to be set aside. The aim of this paper is to present a new and more robust version of the conceivability argument for dualism that appeals to the subjective character of experience. Drawing on insights by philosophers in the phenomenological tradition, I conceptualise the first-person subjective character of experience as a transcendental condition of possibility for phenomenality that cannot be reduced to third-person facts about the physical world. Given this, the mind-body problem as it pertains to consciousness does not merely concern the inability of the set of physical facts about a brain state to capture the qualitative character of experience, but concerns the existential issue of why this brain state is accompanied by first-person subjectivity at all. This allows us to reconceive the conceivability argument in a way that presents a stronger case for dualism than the traditional version of the argument.

AB - In the philosophical literature on consciousness and the mind-body problem, the conceivability argument against physicalism is usually taken to support a form of dualism between physicality and phenomenality. Usually, the discussion focuses on the qualitative character of experience, which is what the phenomenal feel of a given experience is like. By contrast, the subjective character of experience, or its individuation to a given first-person subject, tends to be set aside. The aim of this paper is to present a new and more robust version of the conceivability argument for dualism that appeals to the subjective character of experience. Drawing on insights by philosophers in the phenomenological tradition, I conceptualise the first-person subjective character of experience as a transcendental condition of possibility for phenomenality that cannot be reduced to third-person facts about the physical world. Given this, the mind-body problem as it pertains to consciousness does not merely concern the inability of the set of physical facts about a brain state to capture the qualitative character of experience, but concerns the existential issue of why this brain state is accompanied by first-person subjectivity at all. This allows us to reconceive the conceivability argument in a way that presents a stronger case for dualism than the traditional version of the argument.

KW - consciousness

KW - philosophical phenomenology

KW - subjectivity

KW - experiential dimension

KW - dualism

KW - conceivability argument

U2 - 10.21464/sp38109

DO - 10.21464/sp38109

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 157

EP - 181

JO - Synthesis philosophica

JF - Synthesis philosophica

SN - 0352-7875

IS - 1

ER -