Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00790-8.
Accepted author manuscript, 16.1 MB, PDF document
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconciling well-being and resilience for sustainable development
AU - Chaigneau, T.
AU - Coulthard, S.
AU - Daw, T.M.
AU - Szaboova, L.
AU - Camfield, L.
AU - Chapin F.S., III
AU - Gasper, D.
AU - Gurney, G.G.
AU - Hicks, C.C.
AU - Ibrahim, M.
AU - James, T.
AU - Jones, L.
AU - Matthews, N.
AU - McQuistan, C.
AU - Reyers, B.
AU - Brown, K.
N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00790-8.
PY - 2022/4/30
Y1 - 2022/4/30
N2 - Securing well-being and building resilience in response to shocks are often viewed as key goals of sustainable development. Here, we present an overview of the latest published evidence, as well as the consensus of a diverse group of scientists and practitioners drawn from a structured analytical review and deliberative workshop process. We argue that resilience and well-being are related in complex ways, but in their applications in practice they are often assumed to be synergistic. Although theoretically compatible, evidence we present here shows that they may in fact work against each other. This has important implications for policy.
AB - Securing well-being and building resilience in response to shocks are often viewed as key goals of sustainable development. Here, we present an overview of the latest published evidence, as well as the consensus of a diverse group of scientists and practitioners drawn from a structured analytical review and deliberative workshop process. We argue that resilience and well-being are related in complex ways, but in their applications in practice they are often assumed to be synergistic. Although theoretically compatible, evidence we present here shows that they may in fact work against each other. This has important implications for policy.
KW - Sustainable development
KW - Analytical reviews
KW - Analytical-deliberative
KW - Well being
KW - Planning
U2 - 10.1038/s41893-021-00790-8
DO - 10.1038/s41893-021-00790-8
M3 - Journal article
VL - 5
SP - 287
EP - 293
JO - Nature Sustainability
JF - Nature Sustainability
SN - 2398-9629
IS - 4
ER -