Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Recursive expected utility and the separation o...
View graph of relations

Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: an experimental study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: an experimental study. / Chakravarty, Sujoy; Roy, Jaideep.
In: Theory and Decision, Vol. 66, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 199-228.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chakravarty S, Roy J. Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: an experimental study. Theory and Decision. 2009 Mar;66(3):199-228. Epub 2008 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s11238-008-9112-4

Author

Chakravarty, Sujoy ; Roy, Jaideep. / Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity : an experimental study. In: Theory and Decision. 2009 ; Vol. 66, No. 3. pp. 199-228.

Bibtex

@article{981fee1be0e541b2a5e2b19a31d50e92,
title = "Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: an experimental study",
abstract = "We use the multiple price list method and a recursive expected utility theory of smooth ambiguity to separate out attitude towards risk from that towards ambiguity. Based on this separation, we investigate if there are differences in agent behaviour under uncertainty over gain amounts vis-a-vis uncertainty over loss amounts. On an aggregate level, we find that (i) subjects are risk averse over gains and risk seeking over losses, displaying a “reflection effect” and (ii) they are ambiguity neutral over gains and are mildly ambiguity seeking over losses. Further analysis shows that on an individual level, and with respect to both risky and ambiguous prospects, there is limited incidence of a reflection effect where subjects are risk/ambiguity averse (seeking) in gains and seeking (averse) in losses, though this incidence is higher for ambiguous prospects. A very high proportion of such cases of reflection exhibit risk (ambiguity) aversion in gains and risk (ambiguity) seeking in losses, with the reverse effect being significantly present in the case of risk but almost absent in case of ambiguity. Our results suggest that reflection across gains and losses is not a stable individual characteristic, but depends upon whether the form of uncertainty is precise or ambiguous, since we rarely find an individual who exhibits reflection in both risky and ambiguous prospects. We also find that correlations between attitudes towards risk and ambiguity were domain dependent.",
keywords = "Recursive expected utility, Risk, Ambiguity, C9, C44, C91",
author = "Sujoy Chakravarty and Jaideep Roy",
year = "2009",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s11238-008-9112-4",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "199--228",
journal = "Theory and Decision",
issn = "0040-5833",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity

T2 - an experimental study

AU - Chakravarty, Sujoy

AU - Roy, Jaideep

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - We use the multiple price list method and a recursive expected utility theory of smooth ambiguity to separate out attitude towards risk from that towards ambiguity. Based on this separation, we investigate if there are differences in agent behaviour under uncertainty over gain amounts vis-a-vis uncertainty over loss amounts. On an aggregate level, we find that (i) subjects are risk averse over gains and risk seeking over losses, displaying a “reflection effect” and (ii) they are ambiguity neutral over gains and are mildly ambiguity seeking over losses. Further analysis shows that on an individual level, and with respect to both risky and ambiguous prospects, there is limited incidence of a reflection effect where subjects are risk/ambiguity averse (seeking) in gains and seeking (averse) in losses, though this incidence is higher for ambiguous prospects. A very high proportion of such cases of reflection exhibit risk (ambiguity) aversion in gains and risk (ambiguity) seeking in losses, with the reverse effect being significantly present in the case of risk but almost absent in case of ambiguity. Our results suggest that reflection across gains and losses is not a stable individual characteristic, but depends upon whether the form of uncertainty is precise or ambiguous, since we rarely find an individual who exhibits reflection in both risky and ambiguous prospects. We also find that correlations between attitudes towards risk and ambiguity were domain dependent.

AB - We use the multiple price list method and a recursive expected utility theory of smooth ambiguity to separate out attitude towards risk from that towards ambiguity. Based on this separation, we investigate if there are differences in agent behaviour under uncertainty over gain amounts vis-a-vis uncertainty over loss amounts. On an aggregate level, we find that (i) subjects are risk averse over gains and risk seeking over losses, displaying a “reflection effect” and (ii) they are ambiguity neutral over gains and are mildly ambiguity seeking over losses. Further analysis shows that on an individual level, and with respect to both risky and ambiguous prospects, there is limited incidence of a reflection effect where subjects are risk/ambiguity averse (seeking) in gains and seeking (averse) in losses, though this incidence is higher for ambiguous prospects. A very high proportion of such cases of reflection exhibit risk (ambiguity) aversion in gains and risk (ambiguity) seeking in losses, with the reverse effect being significantly present in the case of risk but almost absent in case of ambiguity. Our results suggest that reflection across gains and losses is not a stable individual characteristic, but depends upon whether the form of uncertainty is precise or ambiguous, since we rarely find an individual who exhibits reflection in both risky and ambiguous prospects. We also find that correlations between attitudes towards risk and ambiguity were domain dependent.

KW - Recursive expected utility

KW - Risk

KW - Ambiguity

KW - C9

KW - C44

KW - C91

U2 - 10.1007/s11238-008-9112-4

DO - 10.1007/s11238-008-9112-4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 66

SP - 199

EP - 228

JO - Theory and Decision

JF - Theory and Decision

SN - 0040-5833

IS - 3

ER -