Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reflections from the COVID-19 pandemic on inequ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Reflections from the COVID-19 pandemic on inequalities and patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in social care, health and public health research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Reflections from the COVID-19 pandemic on inequalities and patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in social care, health and public health research. / Clark, M.; van Vliet, E.; Collins, M.
In: Health Expectations, Vol. 24, No. 5, 31.10.2021, p. 1547-1550.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{70d106e8d4a5445eac33688f6d8a3784,
title = "Reflections from the COVID-19 pandemic on inequalities and patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in social care, health and public health research",
abstract = "Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) has evolved to become widely established practice in social care, health and public health research in the UK. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused rapid change in practice in PPIE, notably in moving from face-to-face meetings to virtual ones. This has opened a space for reflecting on established PPIE practice, but there is a risk this is conducted too narrowly, such as only weighing our preferences and the relative pros and cons with regard to in-person versus virtual meetings. The pandemic has also demonstrated the wide inequalities in society, and hence, we argue that an inequalities lens ought to guide a deeper and wider reflection on PPIE practice. We do not seek to criticize practice pre- or during the pandemic, but to encourage using the inequalities lens as a means of encouraging debate and focusing energy on a more rigorous review of PPIE practice to widen involvement in social care, health and public health research.  ",
author = "M. Clark and {van Vliet}, E. and M. Collins",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/hex.13278",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1547--1550",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections from the COVID-19 pandemic on inequalities and patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in social care, health and public health research

AU - Clark, M.

AU - van Vliet, E.

AU - Collins, M.

PY - 2021/10/31

Y1 - 2021/10/31

N2 - Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) has evolved to become widely established practice in social care, health and public health research in the UK. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused rapid change in practice in PPIE, notably in moving from face-to-face meetings to virtual ones. This has opened a space for reflecting on established PPIE practice, but there is a risk this is conducted too narrowly, such as only weighing our preferences and the relative pros and cons with regard to in-person versus virtual meetings. The pandemic has also demonstrated the wide inequalities in society, and hence, we argue that an inequalities lens ought to guide a deeper and wider reflection on PPIE practice. We do not seek to criticize practice pre- or during the pandemic, but to encourage using the inequalities lens as a means of encouraging debate and focusing energy on a more rigorous review of PPIE practice to widen involvement in social care, health and public health research.  

AB - Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) has evolved to become widely established practice in social care, health and public health research in the UK. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused rapid change in practice in PPIE, notably in moving from face-to-face meetings to virtual ones. This has opened a space for reflecting on established PPIE practice, but there is a risk this is conducted too narrowly, such as only weighing our preferences and the relative pros and cons with regard to in-person versus virtual meetings. The pandemic has also demonstrated the wide inequalities in society, and hence, we argue that an inequalities lens ought to guide a deeper and wider reflection on PPIE practice. We do not seek to criticize practice pre- or during the pandemic, but to encourage using the inequalities lens as a means of encouraging debate and focusing energy on a more rigorous review of PPIE practice to widen involvement in social care, health and public health research.  

U2 - 10.1111/hex.13278

DO - 10.1111/hex.13278

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 1547

EP - 1550

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 5

ER -