Final published version
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Reflections on mainstreaming health equity in a large research collaboration
T2 - “If I can’t dance it is not my revolution"
AU - Porroche-Escudero, Ana
AU - Popay, Jennie
PY - 2022/5/14
Y1 - 2022/5/14
N2 - The concept of health promotion emerged largely in the context of the Ottawa Chapter to acknowledge that socio-economic and political factors and inequalities shape health. But there are concerns that health promotion has been co-opted by the individualistic machinery of positivism that dominates much biomedicine in general. This creates a host of challenges for the way in which health promotion research is conducted. And researchers have a critical role to play in eliminating these by producing high-value evidence that informs better-tailored recommendations for policy and practice.This chapter is about the response of a large English partnership organisation to the lack of an equity focus in health research. It highlights one way in which a health equity lens can be organisationally embedded in the institutions that govern and conduct health promotion research: its culture, processes, systems, projects and individual practices. A process that we described as health equity mainstreaming. Additionally, this chapter also reveals how our reflective practice throughout the process was essential to understand better how health equity mainstreaming could work (or not) in practice. We conclude by asking what Health Equity mainstreaming means for how the health promotion community should carry out research.
AB - The concept of health promotion emerged largely in the context of the Ottawa Chapter to acknowledge that socio-economic and political factors and inequalities shape health. But there are concerns that health promotion has been co-opted by the individualistic machinery of positivism that dominates much biomedicine in general. This creates a host of challenges for the way in which health promotion research is conducted. And researchers have a critical role to play in eliminating these by producing high-value evidence that informs better-tailored recommendations for policy and practice.This chapter is about the response of a large English partnership organisation to the lack of an equity focus in health research. It highlights one way in which a health equity lens can be organisationally embedded in the institutions that govern and conduct health promotion research: its culture, processes, systems, projects and individual practices. A process that we described as health equity mainstreaming. Additionally, this chapter also reveals how our reflective practice throughout the process was essential to understand better how health equity mainstreaming could work (or not) in practice. We conclude by asking what Health Equity mainstreaming means for how the health promotion community should carry out research.
KW - health promotion
KW - Mainstreaming
KW - health equity
KW - health equity mainstreaming
KW - health inequalities
KW - research collaboration
KW - health research
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-97212-7_45
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-97212-7_45
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
SN - 9783030972110
VL - 1
SP - 693
EP - 704
BT - Global Handbook of Health Promotion Research
A2 - Potvin, Louise
A2 - Jourdan, Didier
PB - Springer
CY - Cham
ER -