Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reflexing complexity: post-genomic knowledge an...

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

Reflexing complexity: post-genomic knowledge and reductionist returns in public science.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Reflexing complexity: post-genomic knowledge and reductionist returns in public science. / Wynne, B.
In: Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 22, No. 5, 01.10.2005, p. 67-94.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wynne B. Reflexing complexity: post-genomic knowledge and reductionist returns in public science. Theory, Culture and Society. 2005 Oct 1;22(5):67-94. doi: 10.1177/0263276405057192

Author

Wynne, B. / Reflexing complexity: post-genomic knowledge and reductionist returns in public science. In: Theory, Culture and Society. 2005 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 67-94.

Bibtex

@article{d396498d4ba44b908c77af63cf28df54,
title = "Reflexing complexity: post-genomic knowledge and reductionist returns in public science.",
abstract = "Dominant social sciences approaches to complexity suggest that awareness of complexity in late-modern society comes from various recent scientific insights. By examining today{\textquoteright}s plant and human genomics sciences, I question this from both ends: first suggesting that typical public culture was already aware of particular salient forms of complexity, such as limits to predictive knowledge (which are often denied by scientific cultures themselves); second, showing how up-to-date genomics science expresses both complexity and its opposites, predictive determinism and reductionism, as coexistent representations of nature and scientific knowledge. I suggest we can understand this self-authored epistemic confusion in modern science by avoiding {\textquoteleft}the usual suspects{\textquoteright} – fading simpler discourses left over from previous scientific times; media oversimplifications; or the need to {\textquoteleft}simplify{\textquoteright} to essentials, for ignorant publics – and looking instead at the silent imaginations of extra-scientific reference groups reflected and projectively performed in scientific discourses-practices themselves. Thus contradictions of complex scientific understandings are systematically created by science{\textquoteright}s own embodiment of epistemic commitments influenced by commercial cultures, and by imagined publics who are important new constructed objects of institutional scientific concerns – over authority and trust. New dimensions of complexity thus come alive through paying attention to neglected tacit dimensions of science–society interrelations.",
keywords = "complexity • epistemic culture • genomics • imagined publics • prediction-control • reduction • reflexivity • systems biology",
author = "B. Wynne",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Sociology",
year = "2005",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0263276405057192",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "67--94",
journal = "Theory, Culture and Society",
issn = "1460-3616",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflexing complexity: post-genomic knowledge and reductionist returns in public science.

AU - Wynne, B.

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Sociology

PY - 2005/10/1

Y1 - 2005/10/1

N2 - Dominant social sciences approaches to complexity suggest that awareness of complexity in late-modern society comes from various recent scientific insights. By examining today’s plant and human genomics sciences, I question this from both ends: first suggesting that typical public culture was already aware of particular salient forms of complexity, such as limits to predictive knowledge (which are often denied by scientific cultures themselves); second, showing how up-to-date genomics science expresses both complexity and its opposites, predictive determinism and reductionism, as coexistent representations of nature and scientific knowledge. I suggest we can understand this self-authored epistemic confusion in modern science by avoiding ‘the usual suspects’ – fading simpler discourses left over from previous scientific times; media oversimplifications; or the need to ‘simplify’ to essentials, for ignorant publics – and looking instead at the silent imaginations of extra-scientific reference groups reflected and projectively performed in scientific discourses-practices themselves. Thus contradictions of complex scientific understandings are systematically created by science’s own embodiment of epistemic commitments influenced by commercial cultures, and by imagined publics who are important new constructed objects of institutional scientific concerns – over authority and trust. New dimensions of complexity thus come alive through paying attention to neglected tacit dimensions of science–society interrelations.

AB - Dominant social sciences approaches to complexity suggest that awareness of complexity in late-modern society comes from various recent scientific insights. By examining today’s plant and human genomics sciences, I question this from both ends: first suggesting that typical public culture was already aware of particular salient forms of complexity, such as limits to predictive knowledge (which are often denied by scientific cultures themselves); second, showing how up-to-date genomics science expresses both complexity and its opposites, predictive determinism and reductionism, as coexistent representations of nature and scientific knowledge. I suggest we can understand this self-authored epistemic confusion in modern science by avoiding ‘the usual suspects’ – fading simpler discourses left over from previous scientific times; media oversimplifications; or the need to ‘simplify’ to essentials, for ignorant publics – and looking instead at the silent imaginations of extra-scientific reference groups reflected and projectively performed in scientific discourses-practices themselves. Thus contradictions of complex scientific understandings are systematically created by science’s own embodiment of epistemic commitments influenced by commercial cultures, and by imagined publics who are important new constructed objects of institutional scientific concerns – over authority and trust. New dimensions of complexity thus come alive through paying attention to neglected tacit dimensions of science–society interrelations.

KW - complexity • epistemic culture • genomics • imagined publics • prediction-control • reduction • reflexivity • systems biology

U2 - 10.1177/0263276405057192

DO - 10.1177/0263276405057192

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 67

EP - 94

JO - Theory, Culture and Society

JF - Theory, Culture and Society

SN - 1460-3616

IS - 5

ER -