Re-framing the knowledge to action challenge through nihr knowledge mobilisation research fellows comment on “cihr health system impact fellows: Reflections on ‘driving change’ within the health system”

Health Research

Text available via DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2020.02
Final published version
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Keywords

Co-Production, Embedded Researcher, Evidence, Fellowship, Knowledge Mobilisation

View graph of relations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Re-framing the knowledge to action challenge through nihr knowledge mobilisation research fellows comment on “cihr health system impact fellows: Reflections on ‘driving change’ within the health system”. / Rycroft-Malone, J.; Langley, J.
In: International Journal of Health Policy and Management, Vol. 9, No. 12, 01.12.2020, p. 531-535.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Bibtex

@article{c6835aea636f4bf8a8e452c20637d3e7,

title = "Re-framing the knowledge to action challenge through nihr knowledge mobilisation research fellows comment on “cihr health system impact fellows: Reflections on {\textquoteleft}driving change{\textquoteright} within the health system”",

abstract = "The ambition of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Health System Impact (HSI) Fellowship initiative to modernise the health system is impressive. Embedded researchers who work between academia and non-academic settings offer an opportunity to reframe the problem of evidence uptake as a product of a gap between those who produce knowledge and those who use it. As such, there has been an increasing interest in the potential of people in embedded research roles to work with stakeholders in the co-production of knowledge to address service challenges. In this commentary, we draw on research and experiential evidence of an embedded researcher initiative, which has similar intentions to the HSI Fellowships programme: the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellowship (KMRF) scheme. We outline the similarities and differences between the two schemes, and then consider the work, characteristics and skills, and organisational arrangements evident in operationalising these types of roles. {\textcopyright} 2020 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.",

keywords = "Co-Production, Embedded Researcher, Evidence, Fellowship, Knowledge Mobilisation",

author = "J. Rycroft-Malone and J. Langley",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.15171/ijhpm.2020.02",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "531--535",

journal = "International Journal of Health Policy and Management",

issn = "2322-5939",

publisher = "Kerman University of Medical Science",

number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-framing the knowledge to action challenge through nihr knowledge mobilisation research fellows comment on “cihr health system impact fellows: Reflections on ‘driving change’ within the health system”

AU - Rycroft-Malone, J.

AU - Langley, J.

PY - 2020/12/1

Y1 - 2020/12/1

N2 - The ambition of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Health System Impact (HSI) Fellowship initiative to modernise the health system is impressive. Embedded researchers who work between academia and non-academic settings offer an opportunity to reframe the problem of evidence uptake as a product of a gap between those who produce knowledge and those who use it. As such, there has been an increasing interest in the potential of people in embedded research roles to work with stakeholders in the co-production of knowledge to address service challenges. In this commentary, we draw on research and experiential evidence of an embedded researcher initiative, which has similar intentions to the HSI Fellowships programme: the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellowship (KMRF) scheme. We outline the similarities and differences between the two schemes, and then consider the work, characteristics and skills, and organisational arrangements evident in operationalising these types of roles. © 2020 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.

AB - The ambition of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Health System Impact (HSI) Fellowship initiative to modernise the health system is impressive. Embedded researchers who work between academia and non-academic settings offer an opportunity to reframe the problem of evidence uptake as a product of a gap between those who produce knowledge and those who use it. As such, there has been an increasing interest in the potential of people in embedded research roles to work with stakeholders in the co-production of knowledge to address service challenges. In this commentary, we draw on research and experiential evidence of an embedded researcher initiative, which has similar intentions to the HSI Fellowships programme: the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellowship (KMRF) scheme. We outline the similarities and differences between the two schemes, and then consider the work, characteristics and skills, and organisational arrangements evident in operationalising these types of roles. © 2020 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.

KW - Co-Production

KW - Embedded Researcher

KW - Evidence

KW - Fellowship

KW - Knowledge Mobilisation

U2 - 10.15171/ijhpm.2020.02

DO - 10.15171/ijhpm.2020.02

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 531

EP - 535

JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

SN - 2322-5939

IS - 12

ER -

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords