Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Relación entre el enfoque inductivo o deductivo...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Relación entre el enfoque inductivo o deductivo del aprendizaje basado en casos en el rendimiento académico, la autoeficacia y la satisfacción de los estudiantes de trabajo social

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Relación entre el enfoque inductivo o deductivo del aprendizaje basado en casos en el rendimiento académico, la autoeficacia y la satisfacción de los estudiantes de trabajo social. / Méndez López, Fátima; Camarero-Grados, Loreto; Moleras-Serra, Anna et al.
In: Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales, No. 44, 14.11.2023, p. 90-103.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Méndez López F, Camarero-Grados L, Moleras-Serra A, Heah R, Porroche Escudero A, Sánchez-Arizcuren R. Relación entre el enfoque inductivo o deductivo del aprendizaje basado en casos en el rendimiento académico, la autoeficacia y la satisfacción de los estudiantes de trabajo social. Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales. 2023 Nov 14;(44):90-103. doi: 10.26754/ojs_ais/accionesinvestigsoc.2023448992

Author

Méndez López, Fátima ; Camarero-Grados, Loreto ; Moleras-Serra, Anna et al. / Relación entre el enfoque inductivo o deductivo del aprendizaje basado en casos en el rendimiento académico, la autoeficacia y la satisfacción de los estudiantes de trabajo social. In: Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales. 2023 ; No. 44. pp. 90-103.

Bibtex

@article{eeb9f7b6e8134ff9a3663a3fb6cd4685,
title = "Relaci{\'o}n entre el enfoque inductivo o deductivo del aprendizaje basado en casos en el rendimiento acad{\'e}mico, la autoeficacia y la satisfacci{\'o}n de los estudiantes de trabajo social",
abstract = "Introduction: Case-Based Learning (CBL) teaching methodology is an active learning methodology that generates a higher level of student participation and significant learning. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare a CBL activity using deductive reasoning (analyse and extract theoretical concepts in a case provided for this purpose) and a CBL activity using inductive reasoning (create a case by implicitly introducing theoretical concepts) in terms of academic performance and studentsatisfaction, as well as to analyse the relationship of the latter with the perception of self-efficacy.Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was developed. 111 students performed both CBL activities (deductive and inductive). Each learning activity dealt with theoretical contents of group psychology. The variables collected were: activity grade, satisfaction with each activity, theoretical exam grade and perception of self-efficacy. A descriptive, correlational, and comparative analysis was conducted using T-Student of related samples.Results: The gradesfor the inductive CBL activity were significantly higher than those for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.042). The students{\' } level of satisfaction in the item “helps to think critically” was evaluated more favourably for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.029). The relationship between the grade of the inductive CBL activity and that obtained in the theoretical exam was significant. There was no correlation between any of the activities and the perceived self-efficacy of the students.Conclusions: The CBL activity with inductive reasoning is more effective to achieve academic performance and the satisfaction with the activities evaluated by the students is high.",
keywords = "Computer Science Applications, History, Education",
author = "{M{\'e}ndez L{\'o}pez}, F{\'a}tima and Loreto Camarero-Grados and Anna Moleras-Serra and Rachel Heah and {Porroche Escudero}, Ana and Rafael S{\'a}nchez-Arizcuren",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "14",
doi = "10.26754/ojs_ais/accionesinvestigsoc.2023448992",
language = "Spanish",
pages = "90--103",
journal = "Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales",
issn = "1132-192X",
publisher = "Universidad de Zaragoza",
number = "44",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relación entre el enfoque inductivo o deductivo del aprendizaje basado en casos en el rendimiento académico, la autoeficacia y la satisfacción de los estudiantes de trabajo social

AU - Méndez López, Fátima

AU - Camarero-Grados, Loreto

AU - Moleras-Serra, Anna

AU - Heah, Rachel

AU - Porroche Escudero, Ana

AU - Sánchez-Arizcuren, Rafael

PY - 2023/11/14

Y1 - 2023/11/14

N2 - Introduction: Case-Based Learning (CBL) teaching methodology is an active learning methodology that generates a higher level of student participation and significant learning. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare a CBL activity using deductive reasoning (analyse and extract theoretical concepts in a case provided for this purpose) and a CBL activity using inductive reasoning (create a case by implicitly introducing theoretical concepts) in terms of academic performance and studentsatisfaction, as well as to analyse the relationship of the latter with the perception of self-efficacy.Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was developed. 111 students performed both CBL activities (deductive and inductive). Each learning activity dealt with theoretical contents of group psychology. The variables collected were: activity grade, satisfaction with each activity, theoretical exam grade and perception of self-efficacy. A descriptive, correlational, and comparative analysis was conducted using T-Student of related samples.Results: The gradesfor the inductive CBL activity were significantly higher than those for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.042). The students ́ level of satisfaction in the item “helps to think critically” was evaluated more favourably for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.029). The relationship between the grade of the inductive CBL activity and that obtained in the theoretical exam was significant. There was no correlation between any of the activities and the perceived self-efficacy of the students.Conclusions: The CBL activity with inductive reasoning is more effective to achieve academic performance and the satisfaction with the activities evaluated by the students is high.

AB - Introduction: Case-Based Learning (CBL) teaching methodology is an active learning methodology that generates a higher level of student participation and significant learning. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare a CBL activity using deductive reasoning (analyse and extract theoretical concepts in a case provided for this purpose) and a CBL activity using inductive reasoning (create a case by implicitly introducing theoretical concepts) in terms of academic performance and studentsatisfaction, as well as to analyse the relationship of the latter with the perception of self-efficacy.Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was developed. 111 students performed both CBL activities (deductive and inductive). Each learning activity dealt with theoretical contents of group psychology. The variables collected were: activity grade, satisfaction with each activity, theoretical exam grade and perception of self-efficacy. A descriptive, correlational, and comparative analysis was conducted using T-Student of related samples.Results: The gradesfor the inductive CBL activity were significantly higher than those for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.042). The students ́ level of satisfaction in the item “helps to think critically” was evaluated more favourably for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.029). The relationship between the grade of the inductive CBL activity and that obtained in the theoretical exam was significant. There was no correlation between any of the activities and the perceived self-efficacy of the students.Conclusions: The CBL activity with inductive reasoning is more effective to achieve academic performance and the satisfaction with the activities evaluated by the students is high.

KW - Computer Science Applications

KW - History

KW - Education

U2 - 10.26754/ojs_ais/accionesinvestigsoc.2023448992

DO - 10.26754/ojs_ais/accionesinvestigsoc.2023448992

M3 - Journal article

SP - 90

EP - 103

JO - Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales

JF - Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales

SN - 1132-192X

IS - 44

ER -