Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Remembering or knowing others? Person recogniti...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Remembering or knowing others? Person recognition and recollective experience.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Remembering or knowing others? Person recognition and recollective experience. / Brandt, Karen R.; Macrae, C. Neil; Schloerscheidt, Astrid M. et al.
In: Memory, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2003, p. 89-100.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Brandt, KR, Macrae, CN, Schloerscheidt, AM & Milne, AB 2003, 'Remembering or knowing others? Person recognition and recollective experience.', Memory, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/741938169

APA

Brandt, K. R., Macrae, C. N., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Milne, A. B. (2003). Remembering or knowing others? Person recognition and recollective experience. Memory, 11(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/741938169

Vancouver

Brandt KR, Macrae CN, Schloerscheidt AM, Milne AB. Remembering or knowing others? Person recognition and recollective experience. Memory. 2003;11(1):89-100. doi: 10.1080/741938169

Author

Brandt, Karen R. ; Macrae, C. Neil ; Schloerscheidt, Astrid M. et al. / Remembering or knowing others? Person recognition and recollective experience. In: Memory. 2003 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 89-100.

Bibtex

@article{a641a941ca2c4d9788959a0c7d83cbaa,
title = "Remembering or knowing others? Person recognition and recollective experience.",
abstract = "Using Tulving's (1985) remember/know procedure, the present research investigated the experiential concomitants of person recognition. Noting basic differences in the manner in which the mind processes expectancy-related material, it was anticipated that facial typicality would be a critical determinant of people's recollective experiences (i.e., remembering vs knowing). In particular, it was expected that whereas remember responses would be more prevalent for distinctive than typical faces, know responses would reflect the opposite pattern. The results of two experiments provided general support for these predictions. In addition, the recollective advantage for distinctive faces was traced to the availability of attentional resources at encoding. These results are considered in the context of contemporary issues in person recognition and social cognition.",
author = "Brandt, {Karen R.} and Macrae, {C. Neil} and Schloerscheidt, {Astrid M.} and Milne, {Alan B.}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1080/741938169",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "89--100",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Remembering or knowing others? Person recognition and recollective experience.

AU - Brandt, Karen R.

AU - Macrae, C. Neil

AU - Schloerscheidt, Astrid M.

AU - Milne, Alan B.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Using Tulving's (1985) remember/know procedure, the present research investigated the experiential concomitants of person recognition. Noting basic differences in the manner in which the mind processes expectancy-related material, it was anticipated that facial typicality would be a critical determinant of people's recollective experiences (i.e., remembering vs knowing). In particular, it was expected that whereas remember responses would be more prevalent for distinctive than typical faces, know responses would reflect the opposite pattern. The results of two experiments provided general support for these predictions. In addition, the recollective advantage for distinctive faces was traced to the availability of attentional resources at encoding. These results are considered in the context of contemporary issues in person recognition and social cognition.

AB - Using Tulving's (1985) remember/know procedure, the present research investigated the experiential concomitants of person recognition. Noting basic differences in the manner in which the mind processes expectancy-related material, it was anticipated that facial typicality would be a critical determinant of people's recollective experiences (i.e., remembering vs knowing). In particular, it was expected that whereas remember responses would be more prevalent for distinctive than typical faces, know responses would reflect the opposite pattern. The results of two experiments provided general support for these predictions. In addition, the recollective advantage for distinctive faces was traced to the availability of attentional resources at encoding. These results are considered in the context of contemporary issues in person recognition and social cognition.

U2 - 10.1080/741938169

DO - 10.1080/741938169

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 89

EP - 100

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 1

ER -