Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: ima...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of 'the public' and their implications

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of 'the public' and their implications. / Walker, Gordon; Cass, Noel; Burningham, Kate et al.
In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 42, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 931-947.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Walker G, Cass N, Burningham K, Barnett J. Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of 'the public' and their implications. Environment and Planning A. 2010 Apr;42(4):931-947. doi: 10.1068/a41400

Author

Walker, Gordon ; Cass, Noel ; Burningham, Kate et al. / Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of 'the public' and their implications. In: Environment and Planning A. 2010 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 931-947.

Bibtex

@article{ba1b242d388448358ff8038238225395,
title = "Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of 'the public' and their implications",
abstract = "'The public' are potentially implicated in processes of sociotechnical change as political actors who welcome or resist technology development in general, or in particular places and settings. We argue in this paper that the potential influence of public subjectivities on sociotechnical change is realised not only through moments of active participation and protest, but also through 'the public' being imagined, given agency, and invoked for various purposes by actors in technical industrial and policy networks. As a case study we explore the significance of an imagined and anticipated public subjectivity for the development of renewable energy technologies in the UK. We use interviews with a diversity of industry and policy actors to explore how imaginaries of the public are constructed from first-hand and mediated experience and knowledge, and the influence these imagined public subjectivitics may have on development trajectories and on actor strategics and activities. We show how the shared expectation of an ever present latent but conditional public hostility to renewable energy project development is seen as shaping the material forms of the technologies, their evolving spatiality, and practices of public engagement involved in obtaining project consent. Implications for the actors we are interested in and for broader questions of democratic practice are considered.",
keywords = "ENVIRONMENTAL RISK, POLICY, GOVERNANCE, UK, PARTICIPATION, TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNITY, POLITICS, ENGAGEMENT, SCIENCE",
author = "Gordon Walker and Noel Cass and Kate Burningham and Julie Barnett",
year = "2010",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1068/a41400",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "931--947",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of 'the public' and their implications

AU - Walker, Gordon

AU - Cass, Noel

AU - Burningham, Kate

AU - Barnett, Julie

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - 'The public' are potentially implicated in processes of sociotechnical change as political actors who welcome or resist technology development in general, or in particular places and settings. We argue in this paper that the potential influence of public subjectivities on sociotechnical change is realised not only through moments of active participation and protest, but also through 'the public' being imagined, given agency, and invoked for various purposes by actors in technical industrial and policy networks. As a case study we explore the significance of an imagined and anticipated public subjectivity for the development of renewable energy technologies in the UK. We use interviews with a diversity of industry and policy actors to explore how imaginaries of the public are constructed from first-hand and mediated experience and knowledge, and the influence these imagined public subjectivitics may have on development trajectories and on actor strategics and activities. We show how the shared expectation of an ever present latent but conditional public hostility to renewable energy project development is seen as shaping the material forms of the technologies, their evolving spatiality, and practices of public engagement involved in obtaining project consent. Implications for the actors we are interested in and for broader questions of democratic practice are considered.

AB - 'The public' are potentially implicated in processes of sociotechnical change as political actors who welcome or resist technology development in general, or in particular places and settings. We argue in this paper that the potential influence of public subjectivities on sociotechnical change is realised not only through moments of active participation and protest, but also through 'the public' being imagined, given agency, and invoked for various purposes by actors in technical industrial and policy networks. As a case study we explore the significance of an imagined and anticipated public subjectivity for the development of renewable energy technologies in the UK. We use interviews with a diversity of industry and policy actors to explore how imaginaries of the public are constructed from first-hand and mediated experience and knowledge, and the influence these imagined public subjectivitics may have on development trajectories and on actor strategics and activities. We show how the shared expectation of an ever present latent but conditional public hostility to renewable energy project development is seen as shaping the material forms of the technologies, their evolving spatiality, and practices of public engagement involved in obtaining project consent. Implications for the actors we are interested in and for broader questions of democratic practice are considered.

KW - ENVIRONMENTAL RISK

KW - POLICY

KW - GOVERNANCE

KW - UK

KW - PARTICIPATION

KW - TECHNOLOGY

KW - COMMUNITY

KW - POLITICS

KW - ENGAGEMENT

KW - SCIENCE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951200562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/a41400

DO - 10.1068/a41400

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 931

EP - 947

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 4

ER -