Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reporting on the case study of synthetic meat

Electronic data

  • Policy report on in-vitro meat

    Rights statement: This report is freely available for fair use (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use).

    Accepted author manuscript, 135 KB, PDF document

View graph of relations

Reporting on the case study of synthetic meat: summary of findings and policy considerations

Research output: Book/Report/ProceedingsCommissioned report

Published

Standard

Reporting on the case study of synthetic meat: summary of findings and policy considerations. / Gunnarsdottir, Kristrun; Strand, Roger; Stephens, Neil et al.
Lancaster University, 2015. 4 p.

Research output: Book/Report/ProceedingsCommissioned report

Harvard

Gunnarsdottir, K, Strand, R, Stephens, N, O'Riordan, K, Fotopoulou, A, Giampietro, M, Kovacic, Z, Lemkow Zetterling, L & Di Masso Tarditti, M 2015, Reporting on the case study of synthetic meat: summary of findings and policy considerations. vol. WP5 Policy Report, March/April 2015 (EPINET Deliverable D8.3, April 2015), Lancaster University.

APA

Gunnarsdottir, K., Strand, R., Stephens, N., O'Riordan, K., Fotopoulou, A., Giampietro, M., Kovacic, Z., Lemkow Zetterling, L., & Di Masso Tarditti, M. (2015). Reporting on the case study of synthetic meat: summary of findings and policy considerations. Lancaster University.

Vancouver

Gunnarsdottir K, Strand R, Stephens N, O'Riordan K, Fotopoulou A, Giampietro M et al. Reporting on the case study of synthetic meat: summary of findings and policy considerations. Lancaster University, 2015. 4 p.

Author

Bibtex

@book{742b1c7cef774b7289a9b412b268107d,
title = "Reporting on the case study of synthetic meat: summary of findings and policy considerations",
abstract = "The in-vitro meat (IVM) research field remains small with perhaps 50 or so scientists active globally. These scientists are in the Netherlands, the US, the UK, Sweden, Israel and Norway, with some interest expressed in Denmark and by a group of bioreactor engineers in Portugal.The aim of the Epinet case study was to explore and interact with these epistemic communities / networks that have been developing, implementing, supporting and promoting IVM technologies. The study team consisted of expertise in sociotechnical evaluations, systems and uncertainty analysis, ethics and media studies. The team identified early on a small set of policy considerations around the issues of public funding and the social shaping of IVM. The question of whether or not IVM research should be publicly funded has had to be viewed in relation to how IVM technologies are represented, understood, shaped and reshaped and, accordingly, what sort of IVM activities should be funded.",
keywords = "In-vitro meat, Public funding, Promotional publics, Artificial foods, Yuck factor, Agro-food system, Animal welfare, Environment, Governance, Policy making, Innovation",
author = "Kristrun Gunnarsdottir and Roger Strand and Neil Stephens and Kate O'Riordan and Aristea Fotopoulou and Mario Giampietro and Zora Kovacic and {Lemkow Zetterling}, Louis and {Di Masso Tarditti}, Marina",
year = "2015",
month = apr,
language = "English",
volume = "WP5 Policy Report, March/April 2015 (EPINET Deliverable D8.3, April 2015)",
publisher = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Reporting on the case study of synthetic meat

T2 - summary of findings and policy considerations

AU - Gunnarsdottir, Kristrun

AU - Strand, Roger

AU - Stephens, Neil

AU - O'Riordan, Kate

AU - Fotopoulou, Aristea

AU - Giampietro, Mario

AU - Kovacic, Zora

AU - Lemkow Zetterling, Louis

AU - Di Masso Tarditti, Marina

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - The in-vitro meat (IVM) research field remains small with perhaps 50 or so scientists active globally. These scientists are in the Netherlands, the US, the UK, Sweden, Israel and Norway, with some interest expressed in Denmark and by a group of bioreactor engineers in Portugal.The aim of the Epinet case study was to explore and interact with these epistemic communities / networks that have been developing, implementing, supporting and promoting IVM technologies. The study team consisted of expertise in sociotechnical evaluations, systems and uncertainty analysis, ethics and media studies. The team identified early on a small set of policy considerations around the issues of public funding and the social shaping of IVM. The question of whether or not IVM research should be publicly funded has had to be viewed in relation to how IVM technologies are represented, understood, shaped and reshaped and, accordingly, what sort of IVM activities should be funded.

AB - The in-vitro meat (IVM) research field remains small with perhaps 50 or so scientists active globally. These scientists are in the Netherlands, the US, the UK, Sweden, Israel and Norway, with some interest expressed in Denmark and by a group of bioreactor engineers in Portugal.The aim of the Epinet case study was to explore and interact with these epistemic communities / networks that have been developing, implementing, supporting and promoting IVM technologies. The study team consisted of expertise in sociotechnical evaluations, systems and uncertainty analysis, ethics and media studies. The team identified early on a small set of policy considerations around the issues of public funding and the social shaping of IVM. The question of whether or not IVM research should be publicly funded has had to be viewed in relation to how IVM technologies are represented, understood, shaped and reshaped and, accordingly, what sort of IVM activities should be funded.

KW - In-vitro meat

KW - Public funding

KW - Promotional publics

KW - Artificial foods

KW - Yuck factor

KW - Agro-food system

KW - Animal welfare

KW - Environment

KW - Governance

KW - Policy making

KW - Innovation

M3 - Commissioned report

VL - WP5 Policy Report, March/April 2015 (EPINET Deliverable D8.3, April 2015)

BT - Reporting on the case study of synthetic meat

PB - Lancaster University

ER -