Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Representations of the Relative Proportions of ...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Representations of the Relative Proportions of Body Part Width

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Representations of the Relative Proportions of Body Part Width. / Wareing, Lettie; Lin, Lisa PY; Readman, Megan et al.
In: Cognition, Vol. 251, 105916, 31.10.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wareing L, Lin LPY, Readman M, Crawford T, Longo M, Linkenauger S. Representations of the Relative Proportions of Body Part Width. Cognition. 2024 Oct 31;251:105916. Epub 2024 Aug 10. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105916

Author

Bibtex

@article{85d6d520da31416ea06c35d6ee704fe0,
title = "Representations of the Relative Proportions of Body Part Width",
abstract = "Despite our wealth of experience with our bodies, our perceptions of our body size are far from veridical. For example, when estimating the relative proportions of their body part lengths, using the hand as a metric, individuals tend to exhibit systematic distortions which vary across body parts. Whilst extensive research with healthy populations has focused on perceptions of body part length, less is known about perceptions of the width of individual body parts and the various components comprising these representations. Across four experiments, representations of the relative proportions of body part width were investigated for both the self and other, and when using both the hand, or a hand-sized stick as the metric. Overall, we found distortions in the perceived width of body parts; however, different patterns of distortions were observed across all experiments. Moreover, the variability across experiments appears not to be moderated by the type of metric used or individuals' posture at the time of estimation. Consequently, findings suggest that, unlike perceptions of body part length, assessed using an identical methodology, our representations of the width of the body parts measured in this task are not fixed and vary across individuals and context. We propose that, as stored width representations of these parts are not necessarily required for navigating our environments, these may not be maintained by our perceptual systems, and thus variable task performance reflects the engagement of idiosyncratic guessing strategies.",
author = "Lettie Wareing and Lin, {Lisa PY} and Megan Readman and Trevor Crawford and Matthew Longo and Sally Linkenauger",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105916",
language = "English",
volume = "251",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representations of the Relative Proportions of Body Part Width

AU - Wareing, Lettie

AU - Lin, Lisa PY

AU - Readman, Megan

AU - Crawford, Trevor

AU - Longo, Matthew

AU - Linkenauger, Sally

PY - 2024/10/31

Y1 - 2024/10/31

N2 - Despite our wealth of experience with our bodies, our perceptions of our body size are far from veridical. For example, when estimating the relative proportions of their body part lengths, using the hand as a metric, individuals tend to exhibit systematic distortions which vary across body parts. Whilst extensive research with healthy populations has focused on perceptions of body part length, less is known about perceptions of the width of individual body parts and the various components comprising these representations. Across four experiments, representations of the relative proportions of body part width were investigated for both the self and other, and when using both the hand, or a hand-sized stick as the metric. Overall, we found distortions in the perceived width of body parts; however, different patterns of distortions were observed across all experiments. Moreover, the variability across experiments appears not to be moderated by the type of metric used or individuals' posture at the time of estimation. Consequently, findings suggest that, unlike perceptions of body part length, assessed using an identical methodology, our representations of the width of the body parts measured in this task are not fixed and vary across individuals and context. We propose that, as stored width representations of these parts are not necessarily required for navigating our environments, these may not be maintained by our perceptual systems, and thus variable task performance reflects the engagement of idiosyncratic guessing strategies.

AB - Despite our wealth of experience with our bodies, our perceptions of our body size are far from veridical. For example, when estimating the relative proportions of their body part lengths, using the hand as a metric, individuals tend to exhibit systematic distortions which vary across body parts. Whilst extensive research with healthy populations has focused on perceptions of body part length, less is known about perceptions of the width of individual body parts and the various components comprising these representations. Across four experiments, representations of the relative proportions of body part width were investigated for both the self and other, and when using both the hand, or a hand-sized stick as the metric. Overall, we found distortions in the perceived width of body parts; however, different patterns of distortions were observed across all experiments. Moreover, the variability across experiments appears not to be moderated by the type of metric used or individuals' posture at the time of estimation. Consequently, findings suggest that, unlike perceptions of body part length, assessed using an identical methodology, our representations of the width of the body parts measured in this task are not fixed and vary across individuals and context. We propose that, as stored width representations of these parts are not necessarily required for navigating our environments, these may not be maintained by our perceptual systems, and thus variable task performance reflects the engagement of idiosyncratic guessing strategies.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105916

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105916

M3 - Journal article

VL - 251

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

M1 - 105916

ER -