Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Representing people, representing nature, repre...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Representing people, representing nature, representing the world.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. / O'Neill, John.
In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2001, p. 483-500.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

O'Neill, J 2001, 'Representing people, representing nature, representing the world.', Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12s

APA

O'Neill, J. (2001). Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4), 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12s

Vancouver

O'Neill J. Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2001;19(4):483-500. doi: 10.1068/c12s

Author

O'Neill, John. / Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2001 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 483-500.

Bibtex

@article{f2595a6025fd434299db16b0b8da5190,
title = "Representing people, representing nature, representing the world.",
abstract = "Problems of representation lie at the centre of recent experiments in deliberative democracy. The problems are not primarily social scientific questions concerning the statistical representiveness of small-scale deliberative institutions but normative questions about their political and ethical legitimacy. Experiments in deliberative democracy often rely for their representative legitimacy on appeals to the presence of members of different groups. However, they often do so without clear sources of authorisation and accountability from those represented. The representation of nonhumans and future generations in deliberative institutions is still more problematic. In the necessary absence of their authorisation, accountability, and presence, claims to speak on their behalf relies on epistemic claims, coupled with care. To highlight these problems is not to claim that small deliberative institutions are illegitimate but rather to point out the need for a clearer account of their role in democratic institutions and the proper sources of contestability of their outcomes.",
author = "John O'Neill",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1068/c12s",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "483--500",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy",
issn = "0263-774X",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representing people, representing nature, representing the world.

AU - O'Neill, John

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Problems of representation lie at the centre of recent experiments in deliberative democracy. The problems are not primarily social scientific questions concerning the statistical representiveness of small-scale deliberative institutions but normative questions about their political and ethical legitimacy. Experiments in deliberative democracy often rely for their representative legitimacy on appeals to the presence of members of different groups. However, they often do so without clear sources of authorisation and accountability from those represented. The representation of nonhumans and future generations in deliberative institutions is still more problematic. In the necessary absence of their authorisation, accountability, and presence, claims to speak on their behalf relies on epistemic claims, coupled with care. To highlight these problems is not to claim that small deliberative institutions are illegitimate but rather to point out the need for a clearer account of their role in democratic institutions and the proper sources of contestability of their outcomes.

AB - Problems of representation lie at the centre of recent experiments in deliberative democracy. The problems are not primarily social scientific questions concerning the statistical representiveness of small-scale deliberative institutions but normative questions about their political and ethical legitimacy. Experiments in deliberative democracy often rely for their representative legitimacy on appeals to the presence of members of different groups. However, they often do so without clear sources of authorisation and accountability from those represented. The representation of nonhumans and future generations in deliberative institutions is still more problematic. In the necessary absence of their authorisation, accountability, and presence, claims to speak on their behalf relies on epistemic claims, coupled with care. To highlight these problems is not to claim that small deliberative institutions are illegitimate but rather to point out the need for a clearer account of their role in democratic institutions and the proper sources of contestability of their outcomes.

U2 - 10.1068/c12s

DO - 10.1068/c12s

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 483

EP - 500

JO - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

JF - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

SN - 0263-774X

IS - 4

ER -