Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reproachatives and imperatives

Research

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Reproachatives and imperatives

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Reproachatives and imperatives. / Van Olmen, Daniel.
In: Linguistics, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 115-162.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Van Olmen, D 2018, 'Reproachatives and imperatives', Linguistics, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 115-162. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0033

APA

Van Olmen, D. (2018). Reproachatives and imperatives. Linguistics, 56(1), 115-162. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0033

Vancouver

Van Olmen D. Reproachatives and imperatives. Linguistics. 2018 Jan;56(1):115-162. Epub 2017 Dec 14. doi: 10.1515/ling-2017-0033

Author

Van Olmen, Daniel. / Reproachatives and imperatives. In: Linguistics. 2018 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 115-162.

Bibtex

@article{437f0833043e4d5ab511c60a04f8ebe4,
title = "Reproachatives and imperatives",
abstract = "This paper studies constructions dedicated to the expression of an after the fact reprimand to a second person in the languages of Europe. Taking a usage-based perspective, it argues against earlier analyses of these reproachatives as imperatives, optatives or conditionals, which fail to capture their idiosyncrasies and overpredict both their cross-linguistic frequency and the grammaticality of types of imperative in a language. Based on a closer examination of Dutch, the paper assumes a middle position between the existing views in that it argues for an account of the Dutch reproachative as the hybrid outcome of the interaction of the aforementioned constructions and of processes such as analogy, conventionalization and insubordination. It explores to what extent such an analysis applies to the other European languages featuring a reproachative and what its implications are for our understanding of imperative semantics.",
author = "{Van Olmen}, Daniel",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1515/ling-2017-0033",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "115--162",
journal = "Linguistics",
issn = "0024-3949",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproachatives and imperatives

AU - Van Olmen, Daniel

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - This paper studies constructions dedicated to the expression of an after the fact reprimand to a second person in the languages of Europe. Taking a usage-based perspective, it argues against earlier analyses of these reproachatives as imperatives, optatives or conditionals, which fail to capture their idiosyncrasies and overpredict both their cross-linguistic frequency and the grammaticality of types of imperative in a language. Based on a closer examination of Dutch, the paper assumes a middle position between the existing views in that it argues for an account of the Dutch reproachative as the hybrid outcome of the interaction of the aforementioned constructions and of processes such as analogy, conventionalization and insubordination. It explores to what extent such an analysis applies to the other European languages featuring a reproachative and what its implications are for our understanding of imperative semantics.

AB - This paper studies constructions dedicated to the expression of an after the fact reprimand to a second person in the languages of Europe. Taking a usage-based perspective, it argues against earlier analyses of these reproachatives as imperatives, optatives or conditionals, which fail to capture their idiosyncrasies and overpredict both their cross-linguistic frequency and the grammaticality of types of imperative in a language. Based on a closer examination of Dutch, the paper assumes a middle position between the existing views in that it argues for an account of the Dutch reproachative as the hybrid outcome of the interaction of the aforementioned constructions and of processes such as analogy, conventionalization and insubordination. It explores to what extent such an analysis applies to the other European languages featuring a reproachative and what its implications are for our understanding of imperative semantics.

U2 - 10.1515/ling-2017-0033

DO - 10.1515/ling-2017-0033

M3 - Journal article

VL - 56

SP - 115

EP - 162

JO - Linguistics

JF - Linguistics

SN - 0024-3949

IS - 1

ER -