Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Research methods for organizational learning: t...

Research

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap. / Li, S; Bartunek, J M; Easterby-Smith, M P V.
In: Management Learning, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2009, p. 439-447.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Li, S, Bartunek, JM & Easterby-Smith, MPV 2009, 'Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap', Management Learning, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 439-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609339682

APA

Li, S., Bartunek, J. M., & Easterby-Smith, M. P. V. (2009). Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap. Management Learning, 40(2), 439-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609339682

Vancouver

Li S, Bartunek JM, Easterby-Smith MPV. Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap. Management Learning. 2009;40(2):439-447. doi: 10.1177/1350507609339682

Author

Li, S ; Bartunek, J M ; Easterby-Smith, M P V. / Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap. In: Management Learning. 2009 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 439-447.

Bibtex

@article{b284057551a6479a984998b287332578,
title = "Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap",
abstract = "Research design has a notable impact on the nature of management and organizational research, and there have been numerous mentions, largely anecdotal, of differences in research design between journals published in the UK and USA. This article describes a systematic study of these supposed differences through content-analysis of 295 articles about organizational learning published in eight leading British- and US-based journals over the past 20 years. The results demonstrate substantial differences in data sources, data collection, and the scale of investigations. We discuss their impact on gaps in the study of organizational learning and offer our own thoughts on possible solutions (as well as challenges) for bridging these gaps. ",
author = "S Li and Bartunek, {J M} and Easterby-Smith, {M P V}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/1350507609339682",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "439--447",
journal = "Management Learning",
issn = "1350-5076",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap

AU - Li, S

AU - Bartunek, J M

AU - Easterby-Smith, M P V

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Research design has a notable impact on the nature of management and organizational research, and there have been numerous mentions, largely anecdotal, of differences in research design between journals published in the UK and USA. This article describes a systematic study of these supposed differences through content-analysis of 295 articles about organizational learning published in eight leading British- and US-based journals over the past 20 years. The results demonstrate substantial differences in data sources, data collection, and the scale of investigations. We discuss their impact on gaps in the study of organizational learning and offer our own thoughts on possible solutions (as well as challenges) for bridging these gaps.

AB - Research design has a notable impact on the nature of management and organizational research, and there have been numerous mentions, largely anecdotal, of differences in research design between journals published in the UK and USA. This article describes a systematic study of these supposed differences through content-analysis of 295 articles about organizational learning published in eight leading British- and US-based journals over the past 20 years. The results demonstrate substantial differences in data sources, data collection, and the scale of investigations. We discuss their impact on gaps in the study of organizational learning and offer our own thoughts on possible solutions (as well as challenges) for bridging these gaps.

U2 - 10.1177/1350507609339682

DO - 10.1177/1350507609339682

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 439

EP - 447

JO - Management Learning

JF - Management Learning

SN - 1350-5076

IS - 2

ER -