Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor...
View graph of relations

Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”. / Grace, J.B.; Adler, P.B.; Seabloom, E.; Borer, E.T.; Hillebrand, H.; Hautier, Y.; Hector, A.; Harpole, W.S.; O’Halloran, L.R.; Anderson, T.M.; Bakker, J.D.; Brown, C.S.; Buckley, Y.; Collins, S.L.; Cottingham, K.L.; Crawley, M.J.; Damschen, E.I.; Davies, K.F.; DeCrappeo, N.M.; Fay, P.A.; Firn, J.; Gruner, D.; Hagenah, N.; Jin, V.L.; Kirkham, K.P.; Knops, J.; La Pierre, K.J.; Lambrinos, J.; Li, W.; Melbourne, B.A.; Mitchell, C.E.; Moore, J.; Morgan, J.; Orrock, J.; Prober, S.; Stevens, Carly; Wragg, P.; Yang, L.H.

In: Science, Vol. 335, No. 6075, 2012, p. 1441-1441.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Grace, JB, Adler, PB, Seabloom, E, Borer, ET, Hillebrand, H, Hautier, Y, Hector, A, Harpole, WS, O’Halloran, LR, Anderson, TM, Bakker, JD, Brown, CS, Buckley, Y, Collins, SL, Cottingham, KL, Crawley, MJ, Damschen, EI, Davies, KF, DeCrappeo, NM, Fay, PA, Firn, J, Gruner, D, Hagenah, N, Jin, VL, Kirkham, KP, Knops, J, La Pierre, KJ, Lambrinos, J, Li, W, Melbourne, BA, Mitchell, CE, Moore, J, Morgan, J, Orrock, J, Prober, S, Stevens, C, Wragg, P & Yang, LH 2012, 'Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”', Science, vol. 335, no. 6075, pp. 1441-1441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214939

APA

Grace, J. B., Adler, P. B., Seabloom, E., Borer, E. T., Hillebrand, H., Hautier, Y., Hector, A., Harpole, W. S., O’Halloran, L. R., Anderson, T. M., Bakker, J. D., Brown, C. S., Buckley, Y., Collins, S. L., Cottingham, K. L., Crawley, M. J., Damschen, E. I., Davies, K. F., DeCrappeo, N. M., ... Yang, L. H. (2012). Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”. Science, 335(6075), 1441-1441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214939

Vancouver

Grace JB, Adler PB, Seabloom E, Borer ET, Hillebrand H, Hautier Y et al. Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”. Science. 2012;335(6075):1441-1441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214939

Author

Grace, J.B. ; Adler, P.B. ; Seabloom, E. ; Borer, E.T. ; Hillebrand, H. ; Hautier, Y. ; Hector, A. ; Harpole, W.S. ; O’Halloran, L.R. ; Anderson, T.M. ; Bakker, J.D. ; Brown, C.S. ; Buckley, Y. ; Collins, S.L. ; Cottingham, K.L. ; Crawley, M.J. ; Damschen, E.I. ; Davies, K.F. ; DeCrappeo, N.M. ; Fay, P.A. ; Firn, J. ; Gruner, D. ; Hagenah, N. ; Jin, V.L. ; Kirkham, K.P. ; Knops, J. ; La Pierre, K.J. ; Lambrinos, J. ; Li, W. ; Melbourne, B.A. ; Mitchell, C.E. ; Moore, J. ; Morgan, J. ; Orrock, J. ; Prober, S. ; Stevens, Carly ; Wragg, P. ; Yang, L.H. / Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”. In: Science. 2012 ; Vol. 335, No. 6075. pp. 1441-1441.

Bibtex

@article{6db2b34e96224eb2a780301adaee81d7,
title = "Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”",
abstract = "Pan et al. claim that our results actually support a strong linear positive relationship between productivity and richness, whereas Fridley et al. contend that the data support a strong humped relationship. These responses illustrate how preoccupation with bivariate patterns distracts from a deeper understanding of the multivariate mechanisms that control these important ecosystem properties. ",
author = "J.B. Grace and P.B. Adler and E. Seabloom and E.T. Borer and H. Hillebrand and Y. Hautier and A. Hector and W.S. Harpole and L.R. O{\textquoteright}Halloran and T.M. Anderson and J.D. Bakker and C.S. Brown and Y. Buckley and S.L. Collins and K.L. Cottingham and M.J. Crawley and E.I. Damschen and K.F. Davies and N.M. DeCrappeo and P.A. Fay and J. Firn and D. Gruner and N. Hagenah and V.L. Jin and K.P. Kirkham and J. Knops and {La Pierre}, K.J. and J. Lambrinos and W. Li and B.A. Melbourne and C.E. Mitchell and J. Moore and J. Morgan and J. Orrock and S. Prober and Carly Stevens and P. Wragg and L.H. Yang",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1126/science.1214939",
language = "English",
volume = "335",
pages = "1441--1441",
journal = "Science",
issn = "0036-8075",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
number = "6075",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”

AU - Grace, J.B.

AU - Adler, P.B.

AU - Seabloom, E.

AU - Borer, E.T.

AU - Hillebrand, H.

AU - Hautier, Y.

AU - Hector, A.

AU - Harpole, W.S.

AU - O’Halloran, L.R.

AU - Anderson, T.M.

AU - Bakker, J.D.

AU - Brown, C.S.

AU - Buckley, Y.

AU - Collins, S.L.

AU - Cottingham, K.L.

AU - Crawley, M.J.

AU - Damschen, E.I.

AU - Davies, K.F.

AU - DeCrappeo, N.M.

AU - Fay, P.A.

AU - Firn, J.

AU - Gruner, D.

AU - Hagenah, N.

AU - Jin, V.L.

AU - Kirkham, K.P.

AU - Knops, J.

AU - La Pierre, K.J.

AU - Lambrinos, J.

AU - Li, W.

AU - Melbourne, B.A.

AU - Mitchell, C.E.

AU - Moore, J.

AU - Morgan, J.

AU - Orrock, J.

AU - Prober, S.

AU - Stevens, Carly

AU - Wragg, P.

AU - Yang, L.H.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Pan et al. claim that our results actually support a strong linear positive relationship between productivity and richness, whereas Fridley et al. contend that the data support a strong humped relationship. These responses illustrate how preoccupation with bivariate patterns distracts from a deeper understanding of the multivariate mechanisms that control these important ecosystem properties.

AB - Pan et al. claim that our results actually support a strong linear positive relationship between productivity and richness, whereas Fridley et al. contend that the data support a strong humped relationship. These responses illustrate how preoccupation with bivariate patterns distracts from a deeper understanding of the multivariate mechanisms that control these important ecosystem properties.

U2 - 10.1126/science.1214939

DO - 10.1126/science.1214939

M3 - Journal article

VL - 335

SP - 1441

EP - 1441

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 6075

ER -