Rights statement: © Johnson, Matthew; Bowden, Gareth; Alonso, Guillermo 2020. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, Volume 22, Number 1 2020. https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.22.1.55
Accepted author manuscript, 303 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Rethinking Disadvantage
T2 - a social capital approach to Widening Participation
AU - Johnson, Matthew
AU - Bowden, Gareth
N1 - © Johnson, Matthew; Bowden, Gareth; Alonso, Guillermo 2020. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, Volume 22, Number 1 2020. https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.22.1.55
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - In England and Wales, the introduction of £9,250 Higher Education tuition fees and concern more broadly about social mobility has led to the creation of a series of initiatives aimed at Widening Participation. Increasingly, critics argue that these initiatives have failed to achieve genuine representativeness, with lower ranked universities absorbing higher numbers of students from under-represented groups, who then face additional challenges in securing progression to employment. In this article, we examine dominant narratives Widening Participation programmes in England and Wales in order to assert means of widening more effectively access, in the first instance, but also retention and progression. Rejecting non-subject-specific instrumental approaches that focus directly on graduate labour market value and earnings, we argue that effective Widening Participation ought to focus centrally on the institutional value of Higher Education and on fostering social capital, especially in lower ranked universities whose graduates are already discriminated against in the labour market. To this end, we evaluate deployment of a Politics-based Widening Participation programme, Rethinking Disadvantage, asserting a set of conclusions for colleagues in other disciplines and institutions seeking to develop their own approaches.
AB - In England and Wales, the introduction of £9,250 Higher Education tuition fees and concern more broadly about social mobility has led to the creation of a series of initiatives aimed at Widening Participation. Increasingly, critics argue that these initiatives have failed to achieve genuine representativeness, with lower ranked universities absorbing higher numbers of students from under-represented groups, who then face additional challenges in securing progression to employment. In this article, we examine dominant narratives Widening Participation programmes in England and Wales in order to assert means of widening more effectively access, in the first instance, but also retention and progression. Rejecting non-subject-specific instrumental approaches that focus directly on graduate labour market value and earnings, we argue that effective Widening Participation ought to focus centrally on the institutional value of Higher Education and on fostering social capital, especially in lower ranked universities whose graduates are already discriminated against in the labour market. To this end, we evaluate deployment of a Politics-based Widening Participation programme, Rethinking Disadvantage, asserting a set of conclusions for colleagues in other disciplines and institutions seeking to develop their own approaches.
U2 - 10.5456/WPLL.22.1.55
DO - 10.5456/WPLL.22.1.55
M3 - Journal article
VL - 22
SP - 55
EP - 78
JO - Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning
JF - Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning
SN - 1466-6529
IS - 1
ER -