Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Revisiting "her" infertility

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Revisiting "her" infertility: medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Revisiting "her" infertility: medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress. / Johnson, Katherine M.; Fledderjohann, Jasmine.
In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 75, No. 5, 09.2012, p. 883-891.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Johnson KM, Fledderjohann J. Revisiting "her" infertility: medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress. Social Science and Medicine. 2012 Sept;75(5):883-891. Epub 2012 May 17. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.020

Author

Johnson, Katherine M. ; Fledderjohann, Jasmine. / Revisiting "her" infertility : medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 75, No. 5. pp. 883-891.

Bibtex

@article{e49adcd4899b4a8db16091ccf177b87e,
title = "Revisiting {"}her{"} infertility: medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress",
abstract = "Prior research emphasizes women's distress and responsibility for a couple's infertility because of gendered, pronatalist norms. Yet some studies suggest that being personally diagnosed and/or undergoing treatment differentially shapes reactions. We focused on differences in women's experiences with diagnosis and treatment, conceptualized as the medicalized embodiment of infertility. Using regression analysis, we examined two psychosocial outcomes (self-identification as infertile and fertility-specific distress) in a sample of 496 heterosexual, U.S. women from the National Survey of Fertility Barriers. Medicalized embodiment was salient to women's reactions, but had different relationships to self-identification versus distress. Although women experienced distress regardless of type of diagnosis, they were generally less likely to self-identify as infertile unless personally diagnosed. As such, we cannot assume that all women universally experience infertility. Future research should also address self-identification and distress as separate as opposed to simultaneous psychosocial outcomes.",
keywords = "Adult, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Stress, Psychological, Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural",
author = "Johnson, {Katherine M.} and Jasmine Fledderjohann",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.020",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "883--891",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting "her" infertility

T2 - medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress

AU - Johnson, Katherine M.

AU - Fledderjohann, Jasmine

N1 - Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Prior research emphasizes women's distress and responsibility for a couple's infertility because of gendered, pronatalist norms. Yet some studies suggest that being personally diagnosed and/or undergoing treatment differentially shapes reactions. We focused on differences in women's experiences with diagnosis and treatment, conceptualized as the medicalized embodiment of infertility. Using regression analysis, we examined two psychosocial outcomes (self-identification as infertile and fertility-specific distress) in a sample of 496 heterosexual, U.S. women from the National Survey of Fertility Barriers. Medicalized embodiment was salient to women's reactions, but had different relationships to self-identification versus distress. Although women experienced distress regardless of type of diagnosis, they were generally less likely to self-identify as infertile unless personally diagnosed. As such, we cannot assume that all women universally experience infertility. Future research should also address self-identification and distress as separate as opposed to simultaneous psychosocial outcomes.

AB - Prior research emphasizes women's distress and responsibility for a couple's infertility because of gendered, pronatalist norms. Yet some studies suggest that being personally diagnosed and/or undergoing treatment differentially shapes reactions. We focused on differences in women's experiences with diagnosis and treatment, conceptualized as the medicalized embodiment of infertility. Using regression analysis, we examined two psychosocial outcomes (self-identification as infertile and fertility-specific distress) in a sample of 496 heterosexual, U.S. women from the National Survey of Fertility Barriers. Medicalized embodiment was salient to women's reactions, but had different relationships to self-identification versus distress. Although women experienced distress regardless of type of diagnosis, they were generally less likely to self-identify as infertile unless personally diagnosed. As such, we cannot assume that all women universally experience infertility. Future research should also address self-identification and distress as separate as opposed to simultaneous psychosocial outcomes.

KW - Adult

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Infertility, Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Self Concept

KW - Stress, Psychological

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.020

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.020

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22647565

VL - 75

SP - 883

EP - 891

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 5

ER -