Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Revisiting Terrell
View graph of relations

Revisiting Terrell: Dangerousness and Indecent Photographs of Children

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Revisiting Terrell: Dangerousness and Indecent Photographs of Children. / Gillespie, Alisdair.
In: Criminal Law Review, Vol. 2022, No. 1, 31.01.2022, p. 5-20.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Gillespie, Alisdair. / Revisiting Terrell : Dangerousness and Indecent Photographs of Children. In: Criminal Law Review. 2022 ; Vol. 2022, No. 1. pp. 5-20.

Bibtex

@article{8b908e4c02254af0b7188b0eeab84415,
title = "Revisiting Terrell: Dangerousness and Indecent Photographs of Children",
abstract = "Discusses the quashing in R. v Terrell (Alexander James) (CA) of an order for imprisonment for public protection imposed for making indecent photographs of children, and sets out arguments supporting re-examination of the view that indecent images cases do not result in a finding of dangerousness.",
keywords = "Child pornography offences, Dangerousness, Imprisonment for public protection, Indecent photographs of children, Risk of reoffending, Secondary victims",
author = "Alisdair Gillespie",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
day = "31",
language = "English",
volume = "2022",
pages = "5--20",
journal = "Criminal Law Review",
issn = "0011-135X",
publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting Terrell

T2 - Dangerousness and Indecent Photographs of Children

AU - Gillespie, Alisdair

PY - 2022/1/31

Y1 - 2022/1/31

N2 - Discusses the quashing in R. v Terrell (Alexander James) (CA) of an order for imprisonment for public protection imposed for making indecent photographs of children, and sets out arguments supporting re-examination of the view that indecent images cases do not result in a finding of dangerousness.

AB - Discusses the quashing in R. v Terrell (Alexander James) (CA) of an order for imprisonment for public protection imposed for making indecent photographs of children, and sets out arguments supporting re-examination of the view that indecent images cases do not result in a finding of dangerousness.

KW - Child pornography offences

KW - Dangerousness

KW - Imprisonment for public protection

KW - Indecent photographs of children

KW - Risk of reoffending

KW - Secondary victims

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2022

SP - 5

EP - 20

JO - Criminal Law Review

JF - Criminal Law Review

SN - 0011-135X

IS - 1

ER -