Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Revisiting Terrell
T2 - Dangerousness and Indecent Photographs of Children
AU - Gillespie, Alisdair
PY - 2022/1/31
Y1 - 2022/1/31
N2 - Discusses the quashing in R. v Terrell (Alexander James) (CA) of an order for imprisonment for public protection imposed for making indecent photographs of children, and sets out arguments supporting re-examination of the view that indecent images cases do not result in a finding of dangerousness.
AB - Discusses the quashing in R. v Terrell (Alexander James) (CA) of an order for imprisonment for public protection imposed for making indecent photographs of children, and sets out arguments supporting re-examination of the view that indecent images cases do not result in a finding of dangerousness.
KW - Child pornography offences
KW - Dangerousness
KW - Imprisonment for public protection
KW - Indecent photographs of children
KW - Risk of reoffending
KW - Secondary victims
M3 - Journal article
VL - 2022
SP - 5
EP - 20
JO - Criminal Law Review
JF - Criminal Law Review
SN - 0011-135X
IS - 1
ER -