Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behav...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review. / Smith, Andrew; Roberts, Anton; Krzemieniewska‐Nandwani, Karolina et al.
In: Campbell Systematic Reviews, Vol. 20, No. 3, e1425, 30.09.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Smith, A, Roberts, A, Krzemieniewska‐Nandwani, K, Eggins, L, Cook, W, Fox, C, Maruna, S, Wallace, S & Szifris, K 2024, 'Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review', Campbell Systematic Reviews, vol. 20, no. 3, e1425. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1425

APA

Smith, A., Roberts, A., Krzemieniewska‐Nandwani, K., Eggins, L., Cook, W., Fox, C., Maruna, S., Wallace, S., & Szifris, K. (2024). Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(3), Article e1425. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1425

Vancouver

Smith A, Roberts A, Krzemieniewska‐Nandwani K, Eggins L, Cook W, Fox C et al. Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2024 Sept 30;20(3):e1425. Epub 2024 Jul 31. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1425

Author

Smith, Andrew ; Roberts, Anton ; Krzemieniewska‐Nandwani, Karolina et al. / Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system : A systematic review. In: Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2024 ; Vol. 20, No. 3.

Bibtex

@article{e3bc5fb27f044b6b9b6770d7b5f42738,
title = "Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review",
abstract = "This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The proposed systematic review is an update to, and extension of, Lipsey et al. (2007). As such we build on their previous aims to: (i) Assess and synthesise the overall impact of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) on offender recidivism; (ii) Examine possible sources of variability in the effectiveness of CBT. Data permitting, we will examine if the effectiveness of CBT varies by: (a) Characteristics of the CBT intervention (e.g., cognitive restructuring vs. cognitive skills training, group v. individual implementation; and/or custodial v. community setting, and/or), (b) Characteristics of the population (e.g., juveniles vs. adult offenders), (c) Implementation factors (e.g., implementing practitioner, use of structured/manualised approaches, delivery mode, and/or programme duration or intensity), (d) Evaluation methods (e.g., randomised vs. non‐randomised research designs); (iv) Determine whether there is a decline in the effect of CBT on recidivism over time; and (v) Investigate whether there is an interaction between implementation factors and time in terms of the effect on recidivism.",
keywords = "CBT, reoffending, criminal justice, cognitive behavioural therapy, recidivism",
author = "Andrew Smith and Anton Roberts and Karolina Krzemieniewska‐Nandwani and Liz Eggins and Will Cook and Chris Fox and Shadd Maruna and Stephanie Wallace and Kirstine Szifris",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/cl2.1425",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "Campbell Systematic Reviews",
issn = "1891-1803",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Smith, Andrew

AU - Roberts, Anton

AU - Krzemieniewska‐Nandwani, Karolina

AU - Eggins, Liz

AU - Cook, Will

AU - Fox, Chris

AU - Maruna, Shadd

AU - Wallace, Stephanie

AU - Szifris, Kirstine

PY - 2024/9/30

Y1 - 2024/9/30

N2 - This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The proposed systematic review is an update to, and extension of, Lipsey et al. (2007). As such we build on their previous aims to: (i) Assess and synthesise the overall impact of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) on offender recidivism; (ii) Examine possible sources of variability in the effectiveness of CBT. Data permitting, we will examine if the effectiveness of CBT varies by: (a) Characteristics of the CBT intervention (e.g., cognitive restructuring vs. cognitive skills training, group v. individual implementation; and/or custodial v. community setting, and/or), (b) Characteristics of the population (e.g., juveniles vs. adult offenders), (c) Implementation factors (e.g., implementing practitioner, use of structured/manualised approaches, delivery mode, and/or programme duration or intensity), (d) Evaluation methods (e.g., randomised vs. non‐randomised research designs); (iv) Determine whether there is a decline in the effect of CBT on recidivism over time; and (v) Investigate whether there is an interaction between implementation factors and time in terms of the effect on recidivism.

AB - This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The proposed systematic review is an update to, and extension of, Lipsey et al. (2007). As such we build on their previous aims to: (i) Assess and synthesise the overall impact of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) on offender recidivism; (ii) Examine possible sources of variability in the effectiveness of CBT. Data permitting, we will examine if the effectiveness of CBT varies by: (a) Characteristics of the CBT intervention (e.g., cognitive restructuring vs. cognitive skills training, group v. individual implementation; and/or custodial v. community setting, and/or), (b) Characteristics of the population (e.g., juveniles vs. adult offenders), (c) Implementation factors (e.g., implementing practitioner, use of structured/manualised approaches, delivery mode, and/or programme duration or intensity), (d) Evaluation methods (e.g., randomised vs. non‐randomised research designs); (iv) Determine whether there is a decline in the effect of CBT on recidivism over time; and (v) Investigate whether there is an interaction between implementation factors and time in terms of the effect on recidivism.

KW - CBT

KW - reoffending

KW - criminal justice

KW - cognitive behavioural therapy

KW - recidivism

U2 - 10.1002/cl2.1425

DO - 10.1002/cl2.1425

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

JO - Campbell Systematic Reviews

JF - Campbell Systematic Reviews

SN - 1891-1803

IS - 3

M1 - e1425

ER -