Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Revolution, evolution, or status quo? Guidelin...
View graph of relations

Revolution, evolution, or status quo? Guidelines for Efficiency Measurement in Health Care.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Revolution, evolution, or status quo? Guidelines for Efficiency Measurement in Health Care. / Hollingsworth, Bruce.
In: Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 37, No. 1, 02.2012, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hollingsworth B. Revolution, evolution, or status quo? Guidelines for Efficiency Measurement in Health Care. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2012 Feb;37(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s11123-011-0221-7

Author

Hollingsworth, Bruce. / Revolution, evolution, or status quo? Guidelines for Efficiency Measurement in Health Care. In: Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 1-5.

Bibtex

@article{4a7cf0c5eef54789bf7c0982d808a259,
title = "Revolution, evolution, or status quo? Guidelines for Efficiency Measurement in Health Care.",
abstract = "This paper discusses ways forward in terms of making efficiency measurement in the area of health care more useful. Options are discussed in terms of the potential introduction of guidelines for the undertaking of studies in this area, in order to make them more useful to policy makers and those involved in service delivery. The process of introducing such guidelines is discussed using the example of the development of guidelines in economic evaluation of health technologies. This presents two alternative ways forward—{\textquoteleft}revolution{\textquoteright}, the establishment of a panel to establish initial guidelines, or {\textquoteleft}evolution{\textquoteright}—the more gradual development of such guidelines over time. The third alternative of {\textquoteleft}status quo{\textquoteright}, representing the current state of play, is seen as the base case scenario. It is concluded that although we are quite a way on in terms of techniques and publications, perhaps revolution, followed by evolution is the way forward.",
keywords = "Efficiency measurement , Guidelines , Health care , Methods",
author = "Bruce Hollingsworth",
year = "2012",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1007/s11123-011-0221-7",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Journal of Productivity Analysis",
issn = "0895-562X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revolution, evolution, or status quo? Guidelines for Efficiency Measurement in Health Care.

AU - Hollingsworth, Bruce

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - This paper discusses ways forward in terms of making efficiency measurement in the area of health care more useful. Options are discussed in terms of the potential introduction of guidelines for the undertaking of studies in this area, in order to make them more useful to policy makers and those involved in service delivery. The process of introducing such guidelines is discussed using the example of the development of guidelines in economic evaluation of health technologies. This presents two alternative ways forward—‘revolution’, the establishment of a panel to establish initial guidelines, or ‘evolution’—the more gradual development of such guidelines over time. The third alternative of ‘status quo’, representing the current state of play, is seen as the base case scenario. It is concluded that although we are quite a way on in terms of techniques and publications, perhaps revolution, followed by evolution is the way forward.

AB - This paper discusses ways forward in terms of making efficiency measurement in the area of health care more useful. Options are discussed in terms of the potential introduction of guidelines for the undertaking of studies in this area, in order to make them more useful to policy makers and those involved in service delivery. The process of introducing such guidelines is discussed using the example of the development of guidelines in economic evaluation of health technologies. This presents two alternative ways forward—‘revolution’, the establishment of a panel to establish initial guidelines, or ‘evolution’—the more gradual development of such guidelines over time. The third alternative of ‘status quo’, representing the current state of play, is seen as the base case scenario. It is concluded that although we are quite a way on in terms of techniques and publications, perhaps revolution, followed by evolution is the way forward.

KW - Efficiency measurement

KW - Guidelines

KW - Health care

KW - Methods

U2 - 10.1007/s11123-011-0221-7

DO - 10.1007/s11123-011-0221-7

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Journal of Productivity Analysis

JF - Journal of Productivity Analysis

SN - 0895-562X

IS - 1

ER -