Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Re-writing the city


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Re-writing the city: negotiating and reflecting on data streams

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

  • Pete Abel
  • Matthew Fox
  • Drew Hemment
  • Catherine Thomson
  • Pavol Gajdos
  • Sha Li
  • Antia Dona Vazquez
  • Rose Barraclough
  • Gabriele Schliwa
  • Steve Turner
  • Jonathon Devitt
  • Jane MacDonald
  • Alex Lee
  • Chris Trueblood
  • Deborah Maxwell
  • Hadi Mehrpouya
  • Mel Woods
  • Vincent Walsh
  • Anäis Moisy
  • Goktug Islamoglu
  • Graeme Sherriff
  • Lara Devitt
  • Kirsty Jennings
  • Chris Speed
  • Fionn Tynan-O'Mahony
  • Vera-Karina Gebhardt
  • Leon Trimble
  • Rob Raikes
  • Karl Monsen
Publication date07/2015
Host publicationBritish HCI '15 Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference
Place of PublicationNew York, NY, USA
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9781450336437
<mark>Original language</mark>English


This paper is an output of a two day 'Festival Lab' held at the Future Everything Festival, Manchester, UK, March 2015. The Festival Lab invited a team of academic researchers to develop a model of public engagement during the festival that would explore specific research questions around mobility, data awareness, and civic engagement. From this brief the academic team developed the Festival Lab 'PuBLiC', and created an activity arc that involved participants borrowing bicycles and responding to structured and unstructured research questions about the future of cycling and data use in the city of Manchester. Equipped with iPhones with bespoke software for collecting short textual comments, photographs and GPS data, participants became integral actors in one-day field studies, taking the role of both subjects and authors of this paper. We present findings and observations noted by participants and researchers, discussing the significance of these as triangulated in a closing workshop plenary session. Finally, we conclude by reflecting on the paper creation process itself, a collaborative, intensive, fast-paced approach that challenges the very framework of academic authority and public engagement.