Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Rhizosphere allocation by canopy‐forming specie...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Rhizosphere allocation by canopy‐forming species dominates soil CO2 efflux in a subarctic landscape

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Thomas C. Parker
  • Karina Clemmensen
  • Nina L Friggens
  • Iain P. Hartley
  • David Johnson
  • Bjorn Lindahl
  • Johan Olofsson
  • Matthias B Siewert
  • Lorna Street
  • Jens-Arne Subke
  • Philip A. Wookey
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/09/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>New Phytologist
Issue number6
Volume227
Number of pages13
Pages (from-to)1818-1830
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date12/05/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In arctic ecosystems, climate change has increased plant productivity. As arctic carbon (C) stocks predominantly are located belowground, the effects of greater plant productivity on soil C storage will significantly determine the net sink/source potential of these ecosystems, but vegetation controls on soil CO 2 efflux remain poorly resolved. In order to identify the role of canopy-forming species in belowground C dynamics, we conducted a girdling experiment with plots distributed across 1 km 2 of treeline birch (Betula pubescens) forest and willow (Salix lapponum) patches in northern Sweden and quantified the contribution of canopy vegetation to soil CO 2 fluxes and belowground productivity. Girdling birches reduced total soil CO 2 efflux in the peak growing season by 53%, which is double the expected amount, given that trees contribute only half of the total leaf area in the forest. Root and mycorrhizal mycelial production also decreased substantially. At peak season, willow shrubs contributed 38% to soil CO 2 efflux in their patches. Our findings indicate that C, recently fixed by trees and tall shrubs, makes a substantial contribution to soil respiration. It is critically important that these processes are taken into consideration in the context of a greening arctic because productivity and ecosystem C sequestration are not synonymous.