Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Rights, Moral Values and Natural Facts: a reply...
View graph of relations

Rights, Moral Values and Natural Facts: a reply to Mary Midgley on the problem of child-abuse.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Rights, Moral Values and Natural Facts: a reply to Mary Midgley on the problem of child-abuse. / Archard, David.
In: Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 9, No. 1, 04.1992, p. 99-104.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Archard D. Rights, Moral Values and Natural Facts: a reply to Mary Midgley on the problem of child-abuse. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 1992 Apr;9(1):99-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.1992.tb00300.x

Author

Archard, David. / Rights, Moral Values and Natural Facts: a reply to Mary Midgley on the problem of child-abuse. In: Journal of Applied Philosophy. 1992 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 99-104.

Bibtex

@article{ffff473f49ee4e72b588ca9cfe8d0a55,
title = "Rights, Moral Values and Natural Facts: a reply to Mary Midgley on the problem of child-abuse.",
abstract = "Mary Midgley asserts that my argument concerning the problem of child-abuse was inappropriately framed in the language of rights, and neglected certain pertinent natural facts. I defend the view that the use of rights-talk was both apposite and did not misrepresent the moral problem in question. I assess the status and character of the natural facts Midgley adduces in criticism of my case, concluding that they do not obviously establish the conclusions she believes they do. Finally I briefly respond to the charge that my suggestions were illiberal.",
author = "David Archard",
year = "1992",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-5930.1992.tb00300.x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "99--104",
journal = "Journal of Applied Philosophy",
issn = "1468-5930",
publisher = "Carfax Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rights, Moral Values and Natural Facts: a reply to Mary Midgley on the problem of child-abuse.

AU - Archard, David

PY - 1992/4

Y1 - 1992/4

N2 - Mary Midgley asserts that my argument concerning the problem of child-abuse was inappropriately framed in the language of rights, and neglected certain pertinent natural facts. I defend the view that the use of rights-talk was both apposite and did not misrepresent the moral problem in question. I assess the status and character of the natural facts Midgley adduces in criticism of my case, concluding that they do not obviously establish the conclusions she believes they do. Finally I briefly respond to the charge that my suggestions were illiberal.

AB - Mary Midgley asserts that my argument concerning the problem of child-abuse was inappropriately framed in the language of rights, and neglected certain pertinent natural facts. I defend the view that the use of rights-talk was both apposite and did not misrepresent the moral problem in question. I assess the status and character of the natural facts Midgley adduces in criticism of my case, concluding that they do not obviously establish the conclusions she believes they do. Finally I briefly respond to the charge that my suggestions were illiberal.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-5930.1992.tb00300.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-5930.1992.tb00300.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 99

EP - 104

JO - Journal of Applied Philosophy

JF - Journal of Applied Philosophy

SN - 1468-5930

IS - 1

ER -